; you will keep getting 80 messages a day, as you say, if you don't
resign for yourself.
--
Jussi Ekholm,Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased
don't have
time to read my current subscribings, not to speak of a new one, and even
very trafficed one, as well. But yes, sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Jussi Ekholm,Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED
in order to not see them in
logs anymore?
--
Jussi Ekholm, Everything is so fine it could be
a spineless jelly. don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased
http://ekhowl.goa-head.org they're just to take
or at least shutting
down all services...
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
msg06352/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
software tries to connect to port 16001? Or does anything? What
should I think about this entry? I admit, I'm *overly* paranoid, when
it comes to running services on my own computer. Any input is
appreciated, and the faster, the better. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux
, most of the iptables
syntax is total hebrew for me... I guess my IQ isn't very high.
*sad grin*.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID
A.J. Rossini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jussi == Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What software tries to connect to port 16001?
GNOME.
Yeah, it was gconfd which was doing that. It just made me wonder,
because I've used Galeon a million times (and AFAIK it launches up
gconfd
/user_prefs, where 'x' is
maybe 5 or something else. This makes SA to stop processing mails
further than hits you just specified.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | ICQ UIN: 156057281
ekh on IRCnet | GnuPG
it as a Bad Thing. As you say,
top-posting usually leads to very excessive quoting and either way, IMHO
it's much harder to read a mail upside down.
thanks for the required_hits tip. next time i try SA, i'll read
through the docs more thoroughly.
No problem.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED
one thing or another; gets my
recommendation, for what it's worth...
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9obt4AtEARxQQCB4RAj1EAJ4s1S2qAF/mB6wHk7wwu9IURzfuoQCfVZuC
v45vD2M/yxkVGrBb9uRl1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because I don't
know what this group is. It's
. What problem did
you have? It may be the language barrier, but I just couldn't
comprehend correctly of what you say above. I apologize, but could you
rephrase?
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
Any insight on this issue would calm me down...
Oh, and I forgot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 0, Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
Good afternoon (from Australia). It's a beautiful, sunny 26 degrees
here...
Hih, it's snowing here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
machine? I seem to remember sunrpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche olaf.dietsche#[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect
the worst? Any insight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm écrivait :
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie that should use this port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche olaf.dietsche#[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Remote system error \
- Connection refused
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I
; you will keep getting 80 messages a day, as you say, if you don't
resign for yourself.
--
Jussi Ekholm,Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased
just don't have
time to read my current subscribings, not to speak of a new one, and even
very trafficed one, as well. But yes, sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Jussi Ekholm,Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED
in order to not see them in
logs anymore?
--
Jussi Ekholm, Everything is so fine it could be
a spineless jelly. don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]all the feelings you're not so much pleased
http://ekhowl.goa-head.org they're just to take
or at least shutting
down all services...
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
pgplXJXeHJGTz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, breaking to someone's system or whatever. I just
hate these people. I've never seen computer, internet connection and
everything related as a tools to cause harm and destruction. It's
beyond me, what satisfaction does these persons get...
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user
know, that there's HOWTO's for these, and I've read those,
of course. But now I'd want to ask first-hand opinion about my iptables
rule file. Is it secure, or what should I do in order to make it more
secure?
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net
software tries to connect to port 16001? Or does anything? What
should I think about this entry? I admit, I'm *overly* paranoid, when
it comes to running services on my own computer. Any input is
appreciated, and the faster, the better. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user
, most of the iptables
syntax is total hebrew for me... I guess my IQ isn't very high.
*sad grin*.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID
. It has let only *one* spam
through, and it haven't catched any legitimate mail.
If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*. I recommend visiting
URL: http://www.spamassassin.org and setting it up. My spam
problems have ended after installing it.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU/Linux
right now...
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | ICQ UIN: 156057281
ekh on IRCnet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
pgpkf1EITRh9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, where 'x' is
maybe 5 or something else. This makes SA to stop processing mails
further than hits you just specified.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | ICQ UIN: 156057281
ekh on IRCnet | GnuPG
it as a Bad Thing. As you say,
top-posting usually leads to very excessive quoting and either way, IMHO
it's much harder to read a mail upside down.
thanks for the required_hits tip. next time i try SA, i'll read
through the docs more thoroughly.
No problem.
--
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED
it would
be still nice and appropriate.
Any hints are highly appreciated.
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http
out *why* PAM is throwing that insult if
'noenv' option is enabled...
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.cjb.net/
pgpr8WRXitsJM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-keygen -d,
copy them with ssh-copy-id and try again.
What does option '-d' for ssh-keygen do? My ssh-keygen doesn't even know
it; or at least '--help' doesn't show it...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Replying to myself, sorry - just trying to provide extra information)
Dietmar Goldbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:20:20AM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
It is very difficult to help you
no success. I'm completely out
of ideas...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9HXtUAtEARxQQCB4RApNDAKCtJZKro5SEb3YcRpen3duBMixUSgCfQkZj
YtxjWEC+O0BTsLjLWlaGlxc=
=8jVv
-END PGP SIGNATURE
to instantly move
using OpenSSH. :-)
Thanks for your reply; I haven't been studying SSH as a protocol, or
different SSH's, so my knowledge ain't very huge...
Take a look at http://www.ssh.com/faq/index.cfm?id=1243
for public key interop
Thanks for the URL!
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL
get *so huge*
amounts of spam (to my public address) these days, that harvesting
them by hand would be extremely annoying.
SpamAssassin is mandatory. One part of a large system, which just needs
to be in place or otherwise things aren't ok - at least, if we're
talking about spam. :-)
- --
Jussi
SpamAssassin and you don't have to tolerate spam anymore.
Or is this some sort of question of principle? If so... *shrug*
That's all I wanted to say.
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux
. :-)
Argh, what a rant...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9SZvfAtEARxQQCB4RAoQgAJ9W1zBn0sHH2QKJYB3JBTZKQ8oFoQCePF6M
I0cAnX1/hJCcpYpcraWHXTA=
=75c8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen some of the discussion about OpenSSL and it's holes, remot
Topic had a mindo, sorry about that. OpenSSL was what I wrote about. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
pgpAIVkysUEW8.pgp
Description: PGP
created with MD5 checksum file, as well? And
does ``debsums'' work in conjunction with apt, so it would check the
package and checksum file before apt installs it? As I said, just
mapping my options here...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcel Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering about the policy, in general - too. Are the
official Debian packages created with MD5 checksum file, as well?
And does ``debsums'' work in conjunction
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Mail Delivery Error
| To: Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| No such user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I'm very much sure, that all of my mails I've sent to
debian-security@lists.debian.org - so, something's broken in
lists.debian.org end? Or am I alone with this problem
one thing or another; gets my
recommendation, for what it's worth...
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9obt4AtEARxQQCB4RAj1EAJ4s1S2qAF/mB6wHk7wwu9IURzfuoQCfVZuC
v45vD2M/yxkVGrBb9uRl1
:783 (LISTEN)
So, I guess this is the tool you were looking for.
Thank you,
HTH!
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9pd2LAtEARxQQCB4RAqToAJ9f5kSVEHtuRciVGjufFooylsHitgCgklBC
and 10% unstable system, and the
base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because I don't
know what this group is. It's called 'sasl' -- what uses it?
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because I don't
know what this group is. It's
. What problem did
you have? It may be the language barrier, but I just couldn't
comprehend correctly of what you say above. I apologize, but could you
rephrase?
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU
the worst?
Any insight on this issue would calm me down...
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9q6dCAtEARxQQCB4RAp3dAKCvH611MwXPY8YK6bxoQD4Vkyui7QCgvLLs
Sov1oZXA35FP0BCUcVBkFNY=
=QeS8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
Any insight on this issue would calm me down...
Oh, and I forgot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 0, Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
Good afternoon (from Australia). It's a beautiful, sunny 26 degrees
here...
Hih, it's snowing here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
machine? I seem to remember sunrpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect
the worst? Any insight on this issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm écrivait :
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie that should use this port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Remote system error \
- Connection refused
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
57 matches
Mail list logo
