[SECURITY] [DSA-067-1] New versions of apache, fixes index bug

2001-07-27 Thread Robert van der Meulen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - Debian Security Advisory DSA-067-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/Robert van der Meulen July 28, 2001

Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position

2001-10-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting Colin Phipps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:12:57AM -0600, John Galt wrote: I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers. The barriers to becoming a developer are mainly

Re: Secure 2.4.x kernel

2001-12-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting Alson van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): snip http://www.openwall.com/linux/ The Openwall patches protect against explointing buffer overruns I think, they're not available for 2.4 yet though. You might seem family, but you should still learn to quote :) (and follow the

Re: sending password in the command line

2001-12-27 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting David Flatz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): #!/usr/bin/perl print('enter pass: '); $tmp = ; system('myprogram enable $user $tmp $ip'); Because then you would still pass the password on the commandline. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail

Re: sending password in the command line

2001-12-27 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, There's a secure-coding (or somesuch) mailinglist over at securityfocus, that might be better suited to these kinds of discussions.. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key.

Re: webhosting

2002-02-26 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Sven Hoexter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): You forgot to mention that you can chroot bind since a 8.x release. Yup ! :) The chroot is not the non plus ultra solution but it throws a few more stones in the way of the script kiddies. plug ..and it is even quite maintainable in a chroot, when

openssh

2002-03-07 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.txt is public, i'm working on new packages+dsa. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key. There are two major products that come out

Re: Purpose of this list

2002-03-16 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Pardon my ignorance, but I was under the impression that this list is only about official Security Announcements for Debian(DSA), and not a general discussion on security. Am I on the wrong list or did I read the list description incorrectly ?

Re: mod_ssl pass phrase related question

2002-03-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting eim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Should I keep my key files unencrypted, or is there another solution which preserves security ? Yes, no. (unless you manually start your apache after booting, i.e. not from init) Greets, Robert (libapache-mod-ssl maintainer) --

Re: snort not recognizing dns server correctly

2002-05-03 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi Jeff, Quoting Jeff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): The 192... is a local private network and the next 2 addresses are dns servers. Snort is constantly logging activity to the 1st dns server as a portscan, and as I understand it, this config entry is supposed to eliminate that. Is this incorrect?

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ian Cumming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should have an ethics agreement between the

Re: OT: Re: beach towel

2002-05-15 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Alan James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): No, but it can save you from the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal. The towel provides security through obscurity. I'm assuming everybody here knows about http://www.systemtoolbox.com/towelday/ ? Greets, Robert -- ( o

Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-20 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when set to 'NO' *does* allow anonymous access. Logging in using the

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): If he really cares about the data (and let's face it, everyone cares about their data :) then I'd recommend dispensing with ftp entirely and using scp or sftp (ssh v2) if the client needs to shift data to or from the box. Configure this for RSA/DSA

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi Dan ( list) Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): 1.2.0-3 is in incoming, or remove the pam_ftp line. Thanks! (I've migrated to $other_ftpd for the time being, but will switch back) If you're running something in situations that could be quite a disaster, I suggest you

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Unfortunately some customers want to pay for a solution where they can just use their silly M$ program like they're used to, and refuse 'complicated' solutions. In that case, WebDAV is the way to go, or

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Why do you think there's anything wrong with ftp? There's nothing wrong with offering data over ftp to the general public, especially when you can guarantee the contents in some way. There is something wrong when you need secure, private transfers.

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-25 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): There's nothing wrong with offering data over ftp to the general public, especially when you can guarantee the contents in some way. There is something wrong when you need secure, private transfers. And what is wrong with it when you need

Re: [OT?] Replacing hacked binaries

2000-12-01 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Jan Martin Mathiassen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): list. it was supposed to go to debian-security, not debian-devel. i need debian-devel removed from the Cc list. if you want to know what was changed, you use tripwire (well, everyone should do that anyway). that util shows changed, deleted,

Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position

2001-10-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting Colin Phipps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:12:57AM -0600, John Galt wrote: I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers. The barriers to becoming a developer are mainly

Re: Secure 2.4.x kernel

2001-12-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting Alson van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): snip http://www.openwall.com/linux/ The Openwall patches protect against explointing buffer overruns I think, they're not available for 2.4 yet though. You might seem family, but you should still learn to quote :) (and follow the

Re: sending password in the command line

2001-12-27 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting David Flatz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): #!/usr/bin/perl print('enter pass: '); $tmp = ; system('myprogram enable $user $tmp $ip'); Because then you would still pass the password on the commandline. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail

Re: sending password in the command line

2001-12-27 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, There's a secure-coding (or somesuch) mailinglist over at securityfocus, that might be better suited to these kinds of discussions.. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key.

Re: securid logins

2002-01-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): yeah, but that's OpenSSH only (which *is* 99% of what you'd use it for). but i'd love a PAM-based solution. maybe i should port it. if openssh can do it, then the code is open-source, then pam should be able to do it too. There are open source

Re: SOME ITEMS THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN OR BE ABLE TO ADVISE ME ON

2002-01-24 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): We could start by blocking @aol.com =) Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't even know it was there until people started replying to it, and i had to look up the original posting in my spam folder.. Greets,

Re: webhosting

2002-02-25 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): For secure DNS service, I suggest djbdns. It's much more secure than BIND. Much!! It also has a much more anal license (much!!) Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL

Re: webhosting

2002-02-25 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote: It also has a much more anal license (much!!) True, true... But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect he was gonna try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else... shrug Nahh,

Re: webhosting

2002-02-26 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Sven Hoexter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): You forgot to mention that you can chroot bind since a 8.x release. Yup ! :) The chroot is not the non plus ultra solution but it throws a few more stones in the way of the script kiddies. plug ..and it is even quite maintainable in a chroot, when

openssh

2002-03-07 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.txt is public, i'm working on new packages+dsa. Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key. There are two major products that come out

Re: Purpose of this list

2002-03-16 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Pardon my ignorance, but I was under the impression that this list is only about official Security Announcements for Debian(DSA), and not a general discussion on security. Am I on the wrong list or did I read the list description incorrectly ?

Re: subscribe

2002-03-18 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Bdale Garbee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): nothing snipped You must be kidding :) Greets, Robert -- Linux Generation encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key. If you want divine justice, die. -- Nick

Re: mod_ssl pass phrase related question

2002-03-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting eim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Should I keep my key files unencrypted, or is there another solution which preserves security ? Yes, no. (unless you manually start your apache after booting, i.e. not from init) Greets, Robert (libapache-mod-ssl maintainer) --

Re: snort not recognizing dns server correctly

2002-05-03 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi Jeff, Quoting Jeff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): The 192... is a local private network and the next 2 addresses are dns servers. Snort is constantly logging activity to the 1st dns server as a portscan, and as I understand it, this config entry is supposed to eliminate that. Is this incorrect?

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ian Cumming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should have an ethics agreement between the

Re: OT: Re: beach towel

2002-05-15 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Alan James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): No, but it can save you from the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal. The towel provides security through obscurity. I'm assuming everybody here knows about http://www.systemtoolbox.com/towelday/ ? Greets, Robert -- ( o

Re: SSH2 Encryption

2002-06-10 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote: 3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH? Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use compression. If you're connecting through a slow line (like a modem), use compression. I'm

Re: SSH2 Encryption

2002-06-10 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Thomas Thurman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I can see how [speed of line] and [whether to use compression] are related, and how [trustedness of line] and [whether to use encryption] are related. But I don't see how anyone could say that If your data's going over a high-speed line, there's no

Re: SSH2 Encryption

2002-06-16 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:29:15PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote: My data isn't worth one bit less because it's travelling over dark fiber :) Eh? If your data is travelling over it, then it isn't dark. http://www.canet3.net/library

Re: SSH2 Encryption

2002-06-16 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Right; when you bought it, it was dark. Once you put light into it, it's no longer dark. If someone thinks dark denotes who owns the tranceivers, well, they're deluded :) Both meanings are 100% correct, and 100% acceptable terms. Maybe if you

Re: DSA 131: Apache Vulnerability

2002-06-20 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ren? Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I don't know about apache-ssl libapache-mod-ssl is in incoming. Greets, Robert -- ( o Linux Generation o ) ///\finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key./\\\ \V_/

Re: DSA-134-1

2002-06-25 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Paul Haesler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Doesn't OpenBSD have a full-disclosure policy anyway? It has 'listen to theo or fuck off' disclosure policy, which basically means you have to do what theo says, and no matter what you do, you'll end up with problems and bitching, and disclosure is only

Re: Telnet information.

2002-07-31 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Jay Kline ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I maay be wrong, but dont the SSH clients need that banner to be able to identify what version to use? Yes; the major/minor combination tells the client which protocol versions can be used. The latest phrack has some interesting information about that as

Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-20 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when set to 'NO' *does* allow anonymous access. Logging in using the

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): If he really cares about the data (and let's face it, everyone cares about their data :) then I'd recommend dispensing with ftp entirely and using scp or sftp (ssh v2) if the client needs to shift data to or from the box. Configure this for RSA/DSA

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi Dan ( list) Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): 1.2.0-3 is in incoming, or remove the pam_ftp line. Thanks! (I've migrated to $other_ftpd for the time being, but will switch back) If you're running something in situations that could be quite a disaster, I suggest you

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Unfortunately some customers want to pay for a solution where they can just use their silly M$ program like they're used to, and refuse 'complicated' solutions. In that case, WebDAV is the way to go, or

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Why do you think there's anything wrong with ftp? There's nothing wrong with offering data over ftp to the general public, especially when you can guarantee the contents in some way. There is something wrong when you need secure, private transfers.

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-25 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): There's nothing wrong with offering data over ftp to the general public, especially when you can guarantee the contents in some way. There is something wrong when you need secure, private transfers. And what is wrong with it when you need