Re: ping22: can not kill this process

2007-12-30 Thread Bill Marcum - New Address!
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:59:33PM -0500, Mike Wang wrote:
 Hi
   Recently one of my web server was invaded by something called ping22.
 it obviously  exploited some perl cgi or php holes on this apache2 server.
 But I do not how it is get exploited.
 
 (1) tried to kill -9 it, it is respawn again automatically.
 
 # ps -ef | grep ping22
 www-data 16848 1 14 14:01 ?00:06:07 ping22
 root 18881 30331  0 14:43 pts/000:00:00 grep ping22
 
 how can I kill it?
 
 (2)
 And  from /proc/16848, the cmdline shows ping22. and
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 0 2007-12-30 14:50 exe - /usr/bin/perl
 
 tried to find / -name *ping22*, can not find the file. How is ping22 get
 started?
 
Either it is a perl script, or /usr/bin/perl has been corrupted.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Rbl

2006-03-31 Thread Bill Marcum
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:25:45AM -0300, Thiago Ribeiro wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
 A friend has a problem with rbl. The address is rbl.kropka.net.
 The company's ip address was added in this list some time ago, before he
 started working there. Now he fixed the problems with the mail server
 and would like to remove his company's address from the blacklist.
 So the rbl site hasnt email contact to remove the ip from the blacklist.
 
 Anyone can help me?
 
whois kropka.net
   Administrative Contact:
  Private, Registration  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Domains by Proxy, Inc.
  DomainsByProxy.com
  15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
  Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
  United States
  (480) 624-2599

   Technical Contact:
  Private, Registration  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Domains by Proxy, Inc.
  DomainsByProxy.com
  15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
  Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
  United States
  (480) 624-2599

You might also try whois on the IP address of rbl.kropka.net.
If this doesn't help, your friend might want to ask for a new IP 
address.


-- 
Chairman of the Bored.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shadow passwords

2005-07-07 Thread Bill Marcum
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:49:17AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
 I am busy building two new proxy servers. I installed the first from
 debian-install CD with the normal installer.  As an exercise in
 disaster recovery I decided to install the second from a CD I have
 build with dfsbuild on the first one.  
 
 On the second machine Tiger reports: 
 
 user is not configured to use shadow passwords ...
 
 How do I change that after an installation that did not ask beforehand
 about shadow passwords?
 
 I did a  'sudo shadowconfig on' but suspect that will only have an
 effect on new passwords - or not?
 
man pwconv


-- 
Tonight you will pay the wages of sin; Don't forget to leave a tip.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 644-1] New chbg packages fix arbitrary code execution

2005-01-21 Thread Bill Marcum
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:14:29PM -0800, Moe wrote:
 After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email 
 attachments, why are you sendinf attachments instead of in-line?
 
 Martin Schulze wrote:
  
 Part 1   Type: C
  Encoding: 8bit
 
What mail client are you using, and why does it see an attachment where 
mutt does not?


-- 
When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that
you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
-- Otto Von Bismarck


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what process is using a port

2004-05-03 Thread Bill Marcum
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:14:31PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Is there a way to figure out what program is using a port. For example I 
 want to know which process is using port 80. How can I do this?
 
netstat -np
Run it as root, or you will only see the PIDs for your own processes.


-- 
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what process is using a port

2004-05-03 Thread Bill Marcum
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:14:31PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Is there a way to figure out what program is using a port. For example I 
 want to know which process is using port 80. How can I do this?
 
netstat -np
Run it as root, or you will only see the PIDs for your own processes.


-- 
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.



Re: Strange 'su' error messages

2004-01-16 Thread Bill Marcum
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:29:10AM +0100, Christian Schuerer wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Since updating my debian server yesterday I get the following error
 messages every hour (generated by logcheck):
 
   Jan 13 00:05:01 asterix su[2102]: + ??? root:bin
 
 Today there is even an additional line:
   
   Jan 13 06:05:01 asterix su[5684]: + ??? root:bin
   Jan 13 06:25:01 asterix su[5741]: + ??? root:nobody
 
 Does anyone have the same error messages/behavior? I'm concerned, but
 hope that it's just a wrong configuration after the update!
 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226838



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Strange 'su' error messages

2004-01-16 Thread Bill Marcum
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:29:10AM +0100, Christian Schuerer wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Since updating my debian server yesterday I get the following error
 messages every hour (generated by logcheck):
 
   Jan 13 00:05:01 asterix su[2102]: + ??? root:bin
 
 Today there is even an additional line:
   
   Jan 13 06:05:01 asterix su[5684]: + ??? root:bin
   Jan 13 06:25:01 asterix su[5741]: + ??? root:nobody
 
 Does anyone have the same error messages/behavior? I'm concerned, but
 hope that it's just a wrong configuration after the update!
 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226838



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: suspicious files in /tmp

2004-01-05 Thread Bill Marcum
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
 Hi
 
 It isn't exactly a debian question, but nevertheless I think this is the 
 appropriate place to post this.
 
 I ran chkrootkit 0.43 on my LFS box. This system is a mail and web 
 server. Chkrootkit complained about two files: /bin/netstat and 
 /usr/bin/env.

What exactly did chkrootkit say about those files?  Were they writable
by non-root users, did they have setuid permission, or what?

-- 
Absurd Procrustean Egghead Cornstarch Variant Bill Marcum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suspicious files in /tmp

2004-01-05 Thread Bill Marcum
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
 Hi
 
 It isn't exactly a debian question, but nevertheless I think this is the 
 appropriate place to post this.
 
 I ran chkrootkit 0.43 on my LFS box. This system is a mail and web 
 server. Chkrootkit complained about two files: /bin/netstat and 
 /usr/bin/env.

What exactly did chkrootkit say about those files?  Were they writable
by non-root users, did they have setuid permission, or what?

-- 
Absurd Procrustean Egghead Cornstarch Variant Bill Marcum