postnuke, phpnike, mambo, ...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To
arch '~U'
For current version:
aptitude -F '%p# %v# %V# %t#' search '~U'
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 4
-d' : daemonize
> '-m 5': Allow maximum 5 children
>
> Just checkout: man spamd
I would suggest having a look at amavisd-new for running SA. I saw a big
performance gain when switching from spamc+spamd to amavisd-new + SA
deb http://
-d' : daemonize
> '-m 5': Allow maximum 5 children
>
> Just checkout: man spamd
I would suggest having a look at amavisd-new for running SA. I saw a big
performance gain when switching from spamc+spamd to amavisd-new + SA
deb http://
Hi,
For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
Any idea?
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
Invalid
Hi,
For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
Any idea?
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
Invalid
Hi,
As i saw that some people uses my packages with the chroot patch for
woody, and as sarge is going to be stable in a week, a month, a year or
so ;-), I just wan't to notice that I now maintain also the "unofficial"
ssh package with chroot patch for sarge.
(those packages are just the latest s
Hi,
As i saw that some people uses my packages with the chroot patch for
woody, and as sarge is going to be stable in a week, a month, a year or
so ;-), I just wan't to notice that I now maintain also the "unofficial"
ssh package with chroot patch for sarge.
(those packages are just the latest s
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:24:31PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ wrote:
> > * Raffaele D'Elia wrote:
> > > This antivirus should protect web clients, not the proxy itself: I'm
> > > quite sure I've already protected the server choosing debian...
>
> Le vendredi 27 février 2004 à 12h38 (+0100), Norb
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:24:31PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ wrote:
> > * Raffaele D'Elia wrote:
> > > This antivirus should protect web clients, not the proxy itself: I'm
> > > quite sure I've already protected the server choosing debian...
>
> Le vendredi 27 février 2004 à 12h38 (+0100), Norb
t this
> L8823-7955TMP.txt.gz file could be?
>
It's a gzip file of the perl modules available from CPAN...
Try "zcat your_file"
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0)
t this
> L8823-7955TMP.txt.gz file could be?
>
It's a gzip file of the perl modules available from CPAN...
Try "zcat your_file"
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0)
e this:
mkpasswd --hash=md5 --salt=YHxt6uZp monpass
and compare it with the stored md5 pass ... if it's the same ... the
user is authenticated.
the salt is a random string generated at the time you create the "md5"
pass.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter
e this:
mkpasswd --hash=md5 --salt=YHxt6uZp monpass
and compare it with the stored md5 pass ... if it's the same ... the
user is authenticated.
the salt is a random string generated at the time you create the "md5"
pass.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
> do you also provide the sources of your unofficial distribution?
>
I just uploaded them (http://debian.home-dn.net/woody/ssh/)
apt-get source should work too
--
Emmanuel Lacour Ea
date with last security fix)
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
> do you also provide the sources of your unofficial distribution?
>
I just uploaded them (http://debian.home-dn.net/woody/ssh/)
apt-get source should work too
--
Emmanuel Lacour Ea
date with last security fix)
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To U
ms for kernel-image, according to the changelog..., but it
seems to be in kernel-source-2.4.20!!!
+kernel-source-2.4.20 (2.4.20-3woody.2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed ptrace security hole.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 P
t woody. For a 2.4.20 kernel grab sid's
> kernel source or the plain vanilla kernel from kernel.org.
>
you've got a 2.4.20 for woody in the pool, you can get it via:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody-proposed-updates main
--
Emmanuel Lacour --
gd.
>
> man klogd
>
I typically add "-c 4" in KLOGD (/etc/init.d/klogd) to avoid the
iptables logging to console.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
pport
Ouuuppss ;-)
AW, it tooks only few minutes to build it...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
I need to do this also, so I prepared a backport to woody of
opengate-proxy, an h323 proxy present in sid. I will test this soon
(this week probably).
deb http://debian.home-dn.net/woody opengate-proxy/
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l
pport
Ouuuppss ;-)
AW, it tooks only few minutes to build it...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I need to do this also, so I prepared a backport to woody of
opengate-proxy, an h323 proxy present in sid. I will test this soon
(this week probably).
deb http://debian.home-dn.net/woody opengate-proxy/
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l
Hi,
Is there someone having information about this web vulnerability, goals
and risks and how to disable it?
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +
Hi,
Is there someone having information about this web vulnerability, goals
and risks and how to disable it?
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2003 at 9:59, Alan James wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native
> > >> win implementation?) ...
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2003 at 9:59, Alan James wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native
> > >> win implementation?) ...
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
> > from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
>
> What about u
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
> > from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
>
> What about u
What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
I think it could avoid fresh debian installs (and fresh admins...)
giving us some unwanted web source-code...
Waiting for c
What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
I think it could avoid fresh debian installs (and fresh admins...)
giving us some unwanted web source-code...
Waiting for c
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
>
> I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
>
> I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> It 's not the error messages when logrotate reload apache config. I have
> this problem after a request.
>
> I have two webserver with the same config. And I can see that the two
> servers receive this request and one of them die
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My webserver with apache (+ mod_ssl) failed when I receive a worms attack.
>
> I see this message in the error log: [error] [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> It 's not the error messages when logrotate reload apache config. I have
> this problem after a request.
>
> I have two webserver with the same config. And I can see that the two
> servers receive this request and one of them die
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My webserver with apache (+ mod_ssl) failed when I receive a worms attack.
>
> I see this message in the error log: [error] [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +, jjj3 wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Logs in my firewall shows me incoming connections to port 113 of the
> firewall!! What it means?
>
start here!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=port+113&meta=site%3Dgroups
--
Easter-eggsSp
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +, jjj3 wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Logs in my firewall shows me incoming connections to port 113 of the
> firewall!! What it means?
>
start here!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=port+113&meta=site%3Dgroups
--
Easter-eggsSp
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:26:13PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody
> on a sparc classic.
>
>
try
netstat -lp
as root, to show the pid doing this.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Li
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:26:13PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody
> on a sparc classic.
>
>
try
netstat -lp
as root, to show the pid doing this.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Li
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> > a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the ch
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> > a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the ch
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> Hi ppl :)
>
> My question is related to a chrooted Apache(+php) and Mysql. They live
> in two different chrooted environment and the problem is that I have
> several php programs which wanna use the mysql, but they can't use it
> s
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> Hi ppl :)
>
> My question is related to a chrooted Apache(+php) and Mysql. They live
> in two different chrooted environment and the problem is that I have
> several php programs which wanna use the mysql, but they can't use it
> s
I'm in doubt, the difference between 1.3.26 and 1.3.27 is security
bugfix. Is the 1.3.26 debian apache from security containing all of those
bugfixes?
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (
I'm in doubt, the difference between 1.3.26 and 1.3.27 is security
bugfix. Is the 1.3.26 debian apache from security containing all of those
bugfixes?
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:10:13PM +0700, Indra Kusuma wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, David Raulo wrote:
>
> # > Did you login via SSH ??
> # >
> #
> # No (I don't have a sshd running). The problem occurs when I log directly on
> # console, or when I do "su -" from an xterm.
> # Have you got an idea
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:58:55AM -0400, Jon McCain wrote:
>
>
> > Renato Lozano wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to implement a way of transfering files securely over the
snip
>
> You can remove the sftp-server program to
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:58:55AM -0400, Jon McCain wrote:
>
>
> > Renato Lozano wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to implement a way of transfering files securely over the
snip
>
> You can remove the sftp-server program t
Is there anyone working in/near Coventry in England who can act as a
debian consultant for file server installation/admin.
Thx.
Reply directly to me ... this is out of list topic
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Pa
Is there anyone working in/near Coventry in England who can act as a
debian consultant for file server installation/admin.
Thx.
Reply directly to me ... this is out of list topic
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 P
Torrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Emmanuel Lacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: cups security
>
> Hmmm . . . you forgot,
>
> apt-get install cupsys-driver-gimpprint
> gunzip .gz
> cp driver /usr/share/cups/model
>
> I guess that is only if the proper
Torrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Emmanuel Lacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: cups security
>
> Hmmm . . . you forgot,
>
> apt-get install cupsys-driver-gimpprint
> gunzip .gz
> cp driver /usr/share/cups/model
>
> I guess that is only if the proper
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:56:51AM -0500, Torrin wrote:
> Good morning everybody, well at least morning over here in Cali. For
> everybody else, Good afternoon, good evening and good night.
>
> I just installed cups and I was wondering if it's possible to have cups
> run properly without having p
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:56:30PM +0200, eim wrote:
> First of all thanks to all for responses.
>
> On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 20:22, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> >
> > > > 'time' is RFC 8
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:56:30PM +0200, eim wrote:
> First of all thanks to all for responses.
>
> On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 20:22, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> >
> > > > 'time'
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:49:53AM -0700, Will Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:23:21AM -0800, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +0200, eim wrote:
> > > A question about some network services
> > > ==
> > >
> > > Hallo Debian fol
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:49:53AM -0700, Will Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:23:21AM -0800, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +0200, eim wrote:
> > > A question about some network services
> > > ==
> > >
> > > Hallo Debian fo
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Jon McCain wrote:
> I've been playing around with the scp and sftp components of putty and
> noticed what I consider a security hole. Winscp does the same thing.
> The user can change to directories above their home. Is there a way to
> chroot them like
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Jon McCain wrote:
> I've been playing around with the scp and sftp components of putty and
> noticed what I consider a security hole. Winscp does the same thing.
> The user can change to directories above their home. Is there a way to
> chroot them like
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:10:10PM +0100, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> Hiya
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:21:45AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> > >Which is the best way to create a POP only account? jus
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:10:10PM +0100, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> Hiya
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:21:45AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> > >Which is the best way to create a POP only account? just
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> to supply it to ftppasswd file?
>
mkpasswd -H md5 mon_password
mkpasswd --version
GNU mkpasswd 4.5.16
--
Easter-eggsSp
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> to supply it to ftppasswd file?
>
mkpasswd -H md5 mon_password
mkpasswd --version
GNU mkpasswd 4.5.16
--
Easter-eggsS
Hi,
I'm just testing mysql authentication with pam and libnss and I saw that
all files in /etc/pam.d/ are 0644 mode. But with libpam-mysql I have to
put in /etc/pam.d/qpopper (for example) login and password of the user
who can show paswords in my database
So who can tell me one thing which e
Hi,
I'm just testing mysql authentication with pam and libnss and I saw that
all files in /etc/pam.d/ are 0644 mode. But with libpam-mysql I have to
put in /etc/pam.d/qpopper (for example) login and password of the user
who can show paswords in my database
So who can tell me one thing which
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:16:05AM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
> eim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
> > /var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
>
> MTAs are inherently disk IO bound. A
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:16:05AM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
> eim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
> > /var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
>
> MTAs are inherently disk IO bound.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:46:13AM +0100, Beno?t MARTINET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just compiled & installed openssh-3.0p1 on my Debian 2.2 but failed
> to login
> using root and users' passwords. Password authentication failed all the time
> and it
> prompted "Permission Denied" on the command l
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:46:13AM +0100, Beno?t MARTINET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just compiled & installed openssh-3.0p1 on my Debian 2.2 but failed
> to login
> using root and users' passwords. Password authentication failed all the time
> and it
> prompted "Permission Denied" on the command
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec "/tmp/config.4271": Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
...
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec "/tmp/config.4271": Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
..
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:51:48PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 29/10/01, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
> > What about a package ssh-chroot in debian? I think the pam module is
> > more interesting as it c
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:51:48PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 29/10/01, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
> > What about a package ssh-chroot in debian? I think the pam module is
> > more interesting as it c
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
> There is a chroot patch for the potato openssh-1.2.3 source in /contrib
> however it appears to be broken.
>
> I have created a modified diff for the Debian package source which will
> apply the patch correctly and build an ssh_1.2.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
> There is a chroot patch for the potato openssh-1.2.3 source in /contrib
> however it appears to be broken.
>
> I have created a modified diff for the Debian package source which will
> apply the patch correctly and build an ssh_1.2
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
> help me:
>
> I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
> and other rules over
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
> help me:
>
> I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
> and other rules over
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly but since
two weeks ( without doing any changes ) I'm unable to go to certain
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly but since
two weeks ( without doing any changes ) I'm unable to go to certai
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:33:31 -0800
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:30:53AM +0200, Luca Gibelli wrote:
> >
> >
> > I created a new account for testing purposes and put the following limits on
> > its password age:
>
> known bug in potato's ssh, password expir
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:33:31 -0800
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:30:53AM +0200, Luca Gibelli wrote:
> >
> >
> > I created a new account for testing purposes and put the following limits on
> > its password age:
>
> known bug in potato's ssh, password expi
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:09:59 -0500
" Paul C. Nendick " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason the web based solution to this is not forthcoming is
> that this is not a web problem. The real solution is to hire
> trustworthy admins capable of learning the right way to admin
> their systems. I
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:09:59 -0500
" Paul C. Nendick " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason the web based solution to this is not forthcoming is
> that this is not a web problem. The real solution is to hire
> trustworthy admins capable of learning the right way to admin
> their systems.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:23 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you're getting into doing "normal" remote admin of a box.
> But why over HTTP ? If you have network connectivity to it, ssh should
> do the job (ssh in as yourself and su/sudo to root?).
>
> If you ca
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:32 +0200
Jean Baptiste Lallement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> U could use sudo ?
>
> Excerpt from http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
> ---
> Sudo (superuser do) allows a system administrator to give certain
> users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or a
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Eric LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do u know webmin?
>
> http://webadmin.sourceforge.net/webmin/
Of course, but I think it's not necessary to use an as big program for this
purpose.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GN
Hi,
I wan't to get some opinions on doing this:
Making someone to be able to create unix users by an http method (from an http
browser).
Making someone to be able to restart a daemon under the identity of root from
http.
I think about some methods:
Running a cgi or system()
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:23 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you're getting into doing "normal" remote admin of a box.
> But why over HTTP ? If you have network connectivity to it, ssh should
> do the job (ssh in as yourself and su/sudo to root?).
>
> If you c
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:26:45 +0200
Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been following the thread. Do you get the message as
> soon as you run sshd or just when someone tries to log in?
>
I get the message when I try to do an scp from local to the chrooted host(as it
must run s
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:32 +0200
Jean Baptiste Lallement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> U could use sudo ?
>
> Excerpt from http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
> ---
> Sudo (superuser do) allows a system administrator to give certain
> users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Eric LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do u know webmin?
>
> http://webadmin.sourceforge.net/webmin/
Of course, but I think it's not necessary to use an as big program for this purpose.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GN
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:19:58 +0100
Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone having an Idea?
>
> Can't see that you got a response to this... you probably need the PAM
> stuff in the chroot (most likely just /etc/pam.d/ssh, but maybe /etc/pam.conf
> or other stuff in pam.d).
>
> Cheers
Hi,
I wan't to get some opinions on doing this:
Making someone to be able to create unix users by an http method (from an http
browser).
Making someone to be able to restart a daemon under the identity of root from http.
I think about some methods:
Running a cgi or system()
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:26:45 +0200
Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been following the thread. Do you get the message as
> soon as you run sshd or just when someone tries to log in?
>
I get the message when I try to do an scp from local to the chrooted host(as it must
run
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
