On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall
with port forwarding ?
I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course)
firewall box with ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
My problem
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall
with port forwarding ?
I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course)
firewall box with ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
My problem
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:18:44PM -0400, Tim Peeler remarked:
In the last 4-5 days we have had 8 servers come under attack.
We are working frantically to keep ahead of these attacks. We
have come to the conclusion that the SSH in woody is likely
vulnerable. Of the 8 servers that have been
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:18:44PM -0400, Tim Peeler remarked:
In the last 4-5 days we have had 8 servers come under attack.
We are working frantically to keep ahead of these attacks. We
have come to the conclusion that the SSH in woody is likely
vulnerable. Of the 8 servers that have been
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:17:48PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI imagined:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:43:06AM +0200, I.R. van Dongen wrote:
lamorak:~# crontab -l
@daily apt-get -q -q -q -q update apt-get -s -q -q -q -q
dist-upgrade
Before you deploy such a mechanism, I advise that
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:35:39PM +, Tom Goulet (UID0) imagined:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 10:46:02AM -0300, danilo lujambio wrote:
sorry by a large of the message , but I am not a security
expert and I have a ftp server secured with the directives
that I found in general docs.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:35:39PM +, Tom Goulet (UID0) imagined:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 10:46:02AM -0300, danilo lujambio wrote:
sorry by a large of the message , but I am not a security
expert and I have a ftp server secured with the directives
that I found in general docs.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:44:13PM -0600, Jones remarked:
I am planning to replace a (dead) Windows 2000 computer that
was used as a web server and email server with a Debian Linux
solution. This machine is connected to the net via DSL and
would run apache and exim/qpopper and sshd.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:53:41PM -0500, Robert B Wilson imagined:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:23:04 -0800 Ted Parvu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bush Doctrine clearly spells out that America is now
an Empire. You are either with us or against us.
When did Bush actually say that America is
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:53:41PM -0500, Robert B Wilson imagined:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:23:04 -0800 Ted Parvu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bush Doctrine clearly spells out that America is now
an Empire. You are either with us or against us.
When did Bush actually say that America is
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:00:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze imagined:
--
Debian Security Advisory DSA 253-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Martin Schulze remarked:
--
Debian Security Advisory DSA 222-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:26:12AM +0100, SteX imagined:
In a stormy day a lighting flash occurred: it carried the
message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
§ How can I get the security updates in CD form?
§ I went to http://www.debian.org/security, but I couldn't
§ find anything § like CD images.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman remarked:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is
up and there is no firewall running so far.
runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman remarked:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is
up and there is no firewall running so far.
runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of
users is allowed to post here. A
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Nathan E Norman remarked:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
This makes sense to me, so I can accept the Spam I receive
through the debian lists. One thing I'm still unclear about
though is the recent post from someone
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:23:11PM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister imagined:
All,
Please do not have your procmail or anything else
automatically mark mail sent from debian's list as spam.
Several valid emails have ended up in my Junk folder because
someone is reporting them to razor. Once
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of
users is allowed to post here. A
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:52:27PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to
Razor; rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting
legitimate email as Spam to Razor?
Right
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:23:11PM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister imagined:
All,
Please do not have your procmail or anything else
automatically mark mail sent from debian's list as spam.
Several valid emails have ended up in my Junk folder because
someone is reporting them to razor. Once
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:23:30AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ remarked:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Respectfully, does anyone know when Sid will receive patches
for the previous Apache vulnerabilities that were fixed for
Potato and Woody, but not Sid? It's been days... Raymond
Because
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:45:34AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ imagined:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ remarked:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Respectfully, does anyone know when Sid will receive
patches for the previous Apache vulnerabilities that
were fixed
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:33:30PM +0100, Martin Schulze remarked:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 195-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:23:30AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ remarked:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Respectfully, does anyone know when Sid will receive patches
for the previous Apache vulnerabilities that were fixed for
Potato and Woody, but not Sid? It's been days... Raymond
Because
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:45:34AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ imagined:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ remarked:
Raymond Wood écrivait :
Respectfully, does anyone know when Sid will receive
patches for the previous Apache vulnerabilities that
were fixed
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Christophe Suire remarked:
Hi,
Is the apache packages 1.3.26-1 and 1.3.26-1.1 are vulnerable
to the DSA-187 advisory ?
Thanks a lot.
--
Christophe Suire
Don't quote me, but I believe they are.
The next question, of course, is: When are we
Hi,
I have no idea if this affects Debian in any way, shape, or form
-- but better safe than sorry, so here it is FYI...
Cheers,
Raymond
- Forwarded message from [...] -
From: [somebody]
To: [another list]
Subject: OpenSSH trojan! (fwd)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:30:37 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:06:09PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] imagined:
On a related note, I just ran dselect and noticed rcconf --
may be that's what I want (-; I'll have to check that out.
rcconf is simple and works very well for me - FYI.
Cheers,
Raymond
--
You deserve to be able to
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:50:54PM +0200, Michael Stone remarked:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-134-4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:37:12PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman remarked:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-134-2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:30:32PM -0400, Rishi L Khan remarked:
I looked into shorewall. It doesn't support ipchains, but
seawall does. Would you suggest updating to iptables or using
seawall?
I am also curious to know if anyone has played with seawall and
can comment on whether it comes
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:30:32PM -0400, Rishi L Khan remarked:
I looked into shorewall. It doesn't support ipchains, but
seawall does. Would you suggest updating to iptables or using
seawall?
I am also curious to know if anyone has played with seawall and
can comment on whether it comes
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 02:51:51PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans imagined:
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:26:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
http://sec.greymagic.com/adv/gm001-ns/
It claims to affect 0.9.7+ but on 1.0 all it does is
crashing my browser.
That bug was fixed in the version of
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Michal Melewski remarked:
Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then?
I think that you should just turn it off :)
'Don't' use isn't equal to 'wipe it out'
I have found the 'rcconf' utility to be very helpful in these
35 matches
Mail list logo
