Re: LDAP search without credetials

, but a trade-off between two problems: either having default access for everyone to data you may not want them to have access to, or having to proliferate a high-value password all over the place. choose your poison :) regards robert -- Robert Lemmen http

Re: LDAP search without credetials

in with real credentials, you get more information. So just saying: locking down your LDAP may not make things more secure, because you now need to proliferate actual credentials all over the place... regards robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com

Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

for lenny is very early in that diagram, whether that is true is questionable. cu robert [0] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

that a direct upgrade from N to N+2 isn't supported doesn't mean that it wouldn't be desirable to get the length of the security support to that length. cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow

, though) it is an odd way, but it is simple and it works because apt will use the other records if the blocked one fails (i do the same). messing with your /etc/hosts isn't much better... cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description

Re: Addressing the recent zlib issue

On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: rsync (probably version 1.1) i'll take care of this one cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian Security Support in Place

if it is supported until may 2006(one year after it got replaced with a new stable version) that's quite a long timeframe and a very good reason for promoting debian! cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bad press related to (missing) Debian security - action

want security fixes for the versions that i have installed, not newer versions. and that's also were things get complicated... cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Darn skiddies (ssh login attempts)

/2005/02/17 cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Compromised system - still ok?

want to do them on the whole content (signature would be the same order of size as teh content too..). so you always sign a message digest. you would want to choose a better one than md5 though (sha1 for example), but that's a trivial change cu robert -- Robert Lemmen

debian security support history

: - was there really no 2.1r1 to 2.1r3? the first point release i can see there is r4... - was there any security support for releases before slink? - any other comments? thanks a lot robert [0] http://www.semistable.com/files/releases.gif [1] http://www.debian.org/News/ -- Robert Lemmen