[OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)

2005-01-30 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050130 20:29]: how does it come, that every time, you're telling such a story and are requested for some proof, one of your services is down, you cite completly unrelated URLs or you don't answer at all? Why not go to http://lists.debian.org/ and

Re: [OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)

2005-01-30 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 21:14 schrieb Alexander Schmehl: Hi! * Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050130 20:29]: how does it come, that every time, you're telling such a story and are requested for some proof, one of your services is down, you cite completly unrelated

Re: [OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)

2005-01-30 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-01-30 22:13:08, schrieb Jan Lühr: Greetings, Don't take it down personal. Jugding about DSA's I've seen, there is currently _no_ security-support for 2.4.18. For reasons I don't know, for thinks, I don't understand, important patches seem to be missing. If you have information

Re: [OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)

2005-01-30 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Jan Lühr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050130 22:13]: Don't take it down personal. Jugding about DSA's I've seen, there is currently _no_ security-support for 2.4.18. I didn't made any statement about security support of 2.4.18. All I said was, that MK can't proof her own statement, that I can't a

Re: [OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)

2005-01-30 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 22:46 schrieb Alexander Schmehl: * Jan Lühr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050130 22:13]: Don't take it down personal. Jugding about DSA's I've seen, there is currently _no_ security-support for 2.4.18. I didn't made any statement about security support of