Hello all,
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked about.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/
It looks like we can take step in Debian 5.0 to mitigate this threat by setting
echvm.mmap_min_addr = 4096
per
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:05:20AM -0800, john wrote:
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked about.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/
It looks like we can
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:05:20AM -0800, john wrote:
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked about.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/
It looks like we can take step in Debian 5.0 to mitigate this threat by
setting
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:05:20AM -0800, john wrote:
Hello all,
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked about.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/
It looks like we can take step in Debian 5.0 to mitigate this threat by
presumably you mean
vm.mmap_min_addr = 4096
not
echvm.mmap_min_addr = 4096
?
micah
Hi Micah,
Yes sorry about that. I meant to write vm.mmap_min_addr
but I quoted from the Debian wiki which showed
how to change the value for echvm.mmap_min_addr
I am a noob and haven't had
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:24:55AM -0800, john wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:05:20AM -0800, john wrote:
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked
about.
Quoting john (lists.j...@gmail.com):
I see that there is another null pointer dereference flaw being talked about.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/
It looks like we can take step in Debian 5.0 to mitigate this threat by
setting
echvm.mmap_min_addr = 4096
7 matches
Mail list logo
