On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
I've rewritten that in the CVS version, should be available in the website
soon.
Please review it in a few days.
Regards
Javier
--
To
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
I've rewritten that in the CVS version, should be available in the website
soon.
Please review it in a few days.
Regards
Javier
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
shouldn't it?
It will
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
shouldn't it?
It will
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually some
minor or major versions behind). Packages for the stable distribution
are
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
But this is not always true. Sometimes the DSA reports For the unstable
distribution (sid) these problems will be fixed soon.
Why this ?
The security team has nothing to do with sid packages. If a fix is ready
when the advisory
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually some
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually some
minor or major versions behind). Packages for the stable distribution
are
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
But this is not always true. Sometimes the DSA reports For the unstable
distribution (sid) these problems will be fixed soon.
Why this ?
The security team has nothing to do with sid packages. If a fix is ready
when the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
From
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually some
12 matches
Mail list logo
