On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:09:28AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Phillip Hofmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:49:44 -0400
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps update-rc.d or rcconf
Paul Hampson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:09:28AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Phillip Hofmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:49:44 -0400
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:58:59AM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
Paul Hampson wrote:
You mean like maybe assigning different questions different priorities,
and letting the user choose the priority which a question needs to have
before it is asked, with some default assumed otherwise?
Excellent
Paul Hampson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:58:59AM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
Paul Hampson wrote:
You mean like maybe assigning different questions different priorities,
and letting the user choose the priority which a question needs to have
before it is asked, with some default assumed
Hi,
From: Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:17:10 +1000
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:09:28AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Phillip Hofmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:12:54AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:17:10 +1000
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:09:28AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like you could just have
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:24:50AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:21:18 -0700
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Kind of off-topic here, but I've been
Hi,
From: Mathias Palm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:23:55 +0200
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:24:50AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date
On 30 Jul 02 23:24:50 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, that would be nice too. I know that the first thing I usually do
when I boot my laptop is to stop a bunch of daemons that started
up at boot (-;
# update-rc.d -f somedaemon remove
AIUI the reasoning is that if you
Hi,
From: Frank Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:33:37 + (UTC)
On 30 Jul 02 23:24:50 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, that would be nice too. I know that the first thing I usually do
when I boot my
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:06:09PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] imagined:
On a related note, I just ran dselect and noticed rcconf --
may be that's what I want (-; I'll have to check that out.
rcconf is simple and works very well for me - FYI.
Cheers,
Raymond
--
You deserve to be able to
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: Frank Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:33:37 + (UTC)
On 30 Jul 02 23:24:50 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, that would be nice too. I
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that's what I want -- I want the software installed,
just not started by default.
(...)
FYI:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch3.en.html#s3.6
I wonder why I wrote it? :)
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps update-rc.d or rcconf (as I posted earlier) can be used to get
the desired behavior -- but I do think that being asked by default at
installation time whether to start stuff up at boot time is better
behavior than the
Hi,
From: Thomas J. Zeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: Frank Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31
Hi,
From: Phillip Hofmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:49:44 -0400
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps update-rc.d or rcconf (as I posted earlier) can be used to get
the desired behavior
Hi,
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:00:51 +0200
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:25:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that's what I want -- I want the software installed,
just
Thanks to all on the Portsentry issue I had
a week ago.
Along those same lines, I have two ports I cannot
figure out (even looking through the LDP) on how
to close or shut down their related services.
They are as follows:
111/tcp sunrpc
111/udp sunrpc
113/tcp auth
1024/tcp kdm
1024/udp unknown
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 at 11:09:49AM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
Thanks to all on the Portsentry issue I had
a week ago.
Along those same lines, I have two ports I cannot
figure out (even looking through the LDP) on how
to close or shut down their related services.
They are as follows:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 01:22:50PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 at 11:09:49AM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
Thanks to all on the Portsentry issue I had
a week ago.
Along those same lines, I have two ports I cannot
figure out (even looking through the LDP) on
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:09, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
Thanks to all on the Portsentry issue I had
a week ago.
Along those same lines, I have two ports I cannot
figure out (even looking through the LDP) on how
to close or shut down their related services.
They are as follows:
111/tcp
Hi,
From: Ruben Porras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: 30 Jul 2002 20:50:42 +0200
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:09, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
Thanks to all on the Portsentry issue I had
a week ago.
Along those same lines, I have two ports I cannot
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Kind of off-topic here, but I've been wondering for a while [1] whether
the portmap package would be made to not install by default.
I'd been wondering the same thing. Beyond that, I've been hoping that,
at some point in the future, Debian won't
Hi,
From: Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some more port closing questions
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:21:18 -0700
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Kind of off-topic here, but I've been wondering for a while [1] whether
the portmap package would be made to not install
24 matches
Mail list logo
