On Tue, 15 May 2007, Abel Martín wrote:
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs which
have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs (raff,
Only if you have a reason to hide who is in your domain.
possibility of suffering DoS attacks (it serves 254
Hi,
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs which
have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs (raff,
rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm paranoid, but I
think there are security issues related to this, including the
possibility of suffering
also sprach Abel Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.15.1356 +0200]:
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs
which have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs
(raff, rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm
paranoid, but I think there are security
also sprach Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.15.1646 +0200]:
the theory: zone transfer of a DNS gives internal information about
structure and IPs of internal machines.
my theory: that information should be public, or at least if it
were, the network should not be unsafer
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Abel Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.15.1356 +0200]:
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs
which have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs
(raff, rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm
paranoid, but I
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.15.1646 +0200]:
the theory: zone transfer of a DNS gives internal information about
structure and IPs of internal machines.
my theory: that information should be public, or at least if it
were, the network
6 matches
Mail list logo
