Greetings!
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:10:38PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new user debian linux,
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
If you want finer access rule granulation, I'd suggest using XINETD
instead of INETD, which is available as alternate .DEB (and supported
by a
Feb 2002 22:10:38 +0700 (JAVT)
Subject: hosts deny, alow
I am new user debian linux,
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
ALL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and try in hosts.allow :
ALL : 202.xxx.xxx.xx1, 202.xxx.xxx.xx2
But when i try from 202.xxx.xxx.xx1 and 202.xxx.xxx.xx2 the message
is Connection
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
ALL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Aku,
To deny all incoming connections for tcpwrapped ports it is
sufficient to have this line in your /etc/hosts.deny file:
ALL: ALL
The endpoint construct isn't necessary for what
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course even if tcp_wrapper gives you access the deamon doesn't
have to do so too... So, maybe it's not the wrapper that's denying you
access. If you think your hosts.deny and hosts.allow files are fine,
then maybe it's good to make sure the
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 at 22:10:38 +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new user debian linux,
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
ALL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and try in hosts.allow :
ALL : 202.xxx.xxx.xx1, 202.xxx.xxx.xx2
But when i try from 202.xxx.xxx.xx1 and 202.xxx.xxx.xx2 the
Greetings!
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:10:38PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new user debian linux,
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
If you want finer access rule granulation, I'd suggest using XINETD
instead of INETD, which is available as alternate .DEB (and supported
by a
I am new user debian linux,
1. i try to configure in hosts.deny :
ALL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and try in hosts.allow :
ALL : 202.xxx.xxx.xx1, 202.xxx.xxx.xx2
But when i try from 202.xxx.xxx.xx1 and 202.xxx.xxx.xx2 the message
is Connection closed by remote host.
how to configure in close all and
7 matches
Mail list logo