. What I'm looking for is basically a drop-in
replacement, i.e. a POP3-server that uses system accounts,
/var/mail/user and doesn't need to be configured a lot.
teapop, popa3d and mailutils-pop3d seem quite promising in this respect,
what are your experiences?
BTW, performance isn't too much
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Christopher Taylor wrote:
Hello List,
since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over
a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in
libc-client (which I think is sensible).
You can re-enable plaintext
).
unfortunately, though, some of my users need this functionality, so I'll
have to swich the server. What I'm looking for is basically a drop-in
replacement, i.e. a POP3-server that uses system accounts,
/var/mail/user and doesn't need to be configured a lot.
teapop, popa3d and mailutils-pop3d seem
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Christopher Taylor wrote:
since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over
a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in
libc-client (which I think is sensible).
You can
2005. június 14. 07:57,
Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- debian-security@lists.debian.org,:
Ian Eure wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
I don't see why it would be helpful, unless you're trying to keep
your info
secret from a determined/resourceful attacker. But an
What's this MiTM attact means?
Man in The Middle is when someone between you and the remote system
modifies packets on their way to the remote system or back, IIRC
--
Fredrik Demonen Vold
/*
- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and
good with ketchup.
*/
Hi!
I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl) support.
Now I can not decide which combination of methods is the most secure (first of
all) and most usefull (lastly) for me.
The courier server supports both SSL and TLS, and I can use PLAIN and CRAM-MD5
methods
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:23 pm, LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl)
support. Now I can not decide which combination of methods is the most
secure (first of all) and most usefull (lastly) for me.
The courier server supports both SSL and TLS
2005. jnius 14. 01:36,
Ian Eure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- debian-security@lists.debian.org,:
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:23 pm, LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl)
support. Now I can not decide which combination of methods is the most
secure
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
2005. jnius 14. 01:36,
Ian Eure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLAIN is easier to set up. IIRC, CRAM-MD5 requires a seperate password
file. Shouldn't be a risk if you're only using PLAIN over TLS.
I understand that with TLS or SSL the clear text passwords
Ian Eure wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
I don't see why it would be helpful, unless you're trying to keep
your info
secret from a determined/resourceful attacker. But an attacker like that
would probably get it anyways.
I use TLS PLAIN, and encrypt/sign my messages with
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this might be of interest to both
lists. The debian-security folks might remember my initial mail on
the subject of setting up pop3-ssl with virtual users using popa3d[1].
At the time there appeared to be some interest from people implementing
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this might be of interest to both
lists. The debian-security folks might remember my initial mail on
the subject of setting up pop3-ssl with virtual users using popa3d[1].
At the time there appeared to be some interest from people implementing
Oops, sorry, first post in a bad list. Here's the correct one...
---BeginMessage---
Janus N. Tøndering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Yes. /bin/true allow a ftp account, /bin/false no.
It's an old style ftpaccess
Oops, sorry, first post in a bad list. Here's the correct one...
---BeginMessage---
Janus N. Tøndering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Yes. /bin/true allow a ftp account, /bin/false no.
It's an old style ftpaccess
and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:23:33 +0100
Kristof Goossens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
service for only few people, and I don't want them to have an account
on the system
also sprach vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2156 +0100]:
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
service for only few people, and I don't want them to have an account
on the system. Well
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system
also sprach Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2226 +0100]:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
so put /bin/true for the shell.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Password:
Last login: Mon Feb 10 16:23:51 2003 on pts/1
Linux x 2.4.20 #1 SMP Sun
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 14:07]:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few
* vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
at all, like that:
leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
/--[ man 5 passwd ]:
| If this field is empty, it defaults to the value /bin/sh.
\--
/bin/false would be a better solution.
--
To
On Mon, 10/02/2003 10:53 +0100, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
packages of stunnel ?
It's in stable. You might want to recompile that package without pthread
Quoting vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Password:
Last login: Mon Feb 10
On Monday 10 February 2003 23:20, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bernard Lheureux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find
.deb packages of stunnel ?
it's in non-US, so include the non-US mirrors in your
* Bernard Lheureux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-02-03 22:53]:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
packages of stunnel ?
??
$ apt-cache show stunnel
Package: stunnel
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Janus
--
Janus Nørgaard Tøndering
email:
Janus N. Tøndering wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
/bin/false returns false, while
, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:23:33 +0100
Kristof Goossens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
service for only few people, and I don't want them to have an account
on the system
also sprach vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2156 +0100]:
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
service for only few people, and I don't want them to have an account
on the system. Well
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system
also sprach Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2226 +0100]:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
so put /bin/true for the shell.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Password:
Last login: Mon Feb 10 16:23:51 2003 on pts/1
Linux x 2.4.20 #1 SMP Sun
also sprach Bernard Lheureux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
packages of stunnel ?
it's in non-US, so include the non-US mirrors in your sources.list!
but i suggest you use courier-pop-ssl, courier-imap
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 14:07]:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few
* vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
at all, like that:
leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
/--[ man 5 passwd ]:
| If this field is empty, it defaults to the value /bin/sh.
\--
/bin/false would be a better solution.
On Mon, 10/02/2003 10:53 +0100, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
packages of stunnel ?
It's in stable. You might want to recompile that package without pthread
Quoting vincenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Password:
Last login: Mon Feb 10
On Monday 10 February 2003 23:20, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bernard Lheureux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find
.deb packages of stunnel ?
it's in non-US, so include the non-US mirrors in your
* Bernard Lheureux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-02-03 22:53]:
About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
packages of stunnel ?
??
$ apt-cache show stunnel
Package: stunnel
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Janus
--
Janus Nørgaard Tøndering
email:
Janus N. Tøndering wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
/bin/false returns false, while
and you've got a very
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend
and you've got a very
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, but no other access whatsoever
Kristof Goossens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, but no other access whatsoever
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:23:33PM +0100, Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account
Kristof Goossens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have
On Sat, 08/02/2003 03:52 +0100, Kuba Jakubik wrote:
Kristof Goossens wrote:
/bin/false. So my question is: Is it possible to create a pop3 account
without
needing to modify the /etc/passwd file?
You should use a pop3 server that supports virtual users, like
popa3d[1].
you need the users
Hi
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
+ incomming authentication SECURE
to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
with SSL
* POP3 (i like qpopper)
+ outgoing authentication SECURE
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt in my mind that we
Hi Christian Schuerer-Waldheim!!!
Google is your friend!
Yes i know.. ;-)
http://www.stunnel.org/patches/desc/syslog_danilche.html
http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/stunnel.html
Kaixo Giacomo Mulas!!!
I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
many others. I _think_ (but did not try)
Quoting Giacomo Mulas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls?
Not excessively difficult with any of the most-used MTAs, in any event.
Some (Postfix, Qmail, Exim) require patching/extensions or a prepatched
package. Some (Sendmail, Courier-MTA) do not.
* Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
Sendmail certainly can't say that.
Depends what your definition of security hacks is.
http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
sendmail is by no means perfect, but
* Rick Moen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
FYI:
...
Thanks, that was enlightening.
--
Scott Moynes http://www.icculus.org/openbox/
Computer science is as much about computers
as astronomy is about telescopes. -- Dijkstra
msg07333/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Thanks, that was enlightening.
Yr. very welcome. I count it a major success when I can add clarity to
a traditionally flame-shrouded subject. ;-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
+ incomming authentication SECURE
to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
with SSL
* POP3 (i like qpopper)
+ outgoing authentication SECURE
Try this.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
/Magnus Wiklander.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Iñaki Martínez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 10 oktober 2002 15:02
Till: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Ämne: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
Hi
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt in my mind that we made the
right decision switching to qmail.
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3
Hi!
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
+ incomming authentication SECURE
to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
with SSL
* POP3 (i like qpopper)
+ outgoing authentication SECURE
Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
Try this.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have authentication.
This also can be done with stunnel..
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i
-security@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt
Hi Christian Schuerer-Waldheim!!!
Google is your friend!
Yes i know.. ;-)
http://www.stunnel.org/patches/desc/syslog_danilche.html
http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/stunnel.html
Kaixo Statu Nascendi!!!
But have you been able to authenticate via SSL to qmail? i patched
qmail-smtpd but i could either authenticate, or make ssl connection. never
the both at the same time.
I prefere Sendmail, if not qmail...
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
many others. I _think_ (but
Kaixo Giacomo Mulas!!!
I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
many others. I _think_ (but did not try) that
Quoting Giacomo Mulas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls?
Not excessively difficult with any of the most-used MTAs, in any event.
Some (Postfix, Qmail, Exim) require patching/extensions or a prepatched
package. Some (Sendmail, Courier-MTA) do not.
On Thu 10 Oct 02 15:47, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
Try this.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have
authentication.
info exim.
You'll need to mess around with lookups and lsearches.
* Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
Sendmail certainly can't say that.
Depends what your definition of security hacks is.
http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
sendmail is by no means perfect, but
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
Sendmail certainly can't say that.
Depends what your definition of security hacks is.
* Rick Moen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
FYI:
...
Thanks, that was enlightening.
--
Scott Moynes http://www.icculus.org/openbox/
Computer science is as much about computers
as astronomy is about telescopes. -- Dijkstra
pgpEbnR0C04Yr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Thanks, that was enlightening.
Yr. very welcome. I count it a major success when I can add clarity to
a traditionally flame-shrouded subject. ;-
Hi guys, I am having one problem with pop3, I am using ipop3d and its working
fine to receive messges from my local clients(in my LAN). But when i try to
get messages from external client(remote notebooks with dialup connection to
Internet using normal ISP) the connection is too slow, i can't
Hi guys, I am having one problem with pop3, I am using ipop3d and its working
fine to receive messges from my local clients(in my LAN). But when i try to
get messages from external client(remote notebooks with dialup connection to
Internet using normal ISP) the connection is too slow, i can't
I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
machine and send your mail back along the same connection, as if the server
hi ya
list of secure pop3 methodologies
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:49:53AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
interface, so I can't get my email messages with pop3 clients
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
interface, so I can't get my email messages with pop3 clients.
Is there any way to tunnel pop3 over ssh? How?
I'm using that with X11
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:49:53AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
interface, so I can't get my email messages with pop3 clients
I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
machine and send your mail back along the same connection, as if the server
were
* Michael Knoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010802 11:41]:
I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
machine and send your
,[ On Thu, Aug 02, at 12:20PM, Vineet Kumar wrote: ]--
| This is only the case if you use the -g option with ssh or have
| GatewayPorts yes in your config file. The default is (thankfully)
| no. Otherwise, the forwarded port is bound to the localhost interface
| only.
The default
hi ya
list of secure pop3 methodologies
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110
Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:13, Moe Harley wrote
I've you are using vim use:
set textwidth=72
in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
I've you are using vim use:
set textwidth=72
in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at
** On Jul 30, Tamas TEVESZ scribbled:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
will not have a lot of connections on it).
www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/Zorp/ - that will
Thank you everyone, I value all the comments ive been receiving on the
subject. :) However when I was referring to secure, i meant more along the
lines of stable. I understand the pop3 protocol and know its limitations
as far as plaintext passwords are concerned, and I fully intend to take
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: pop3
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
via popa3d. I'll attach
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
/home
)
Indeed, I have been doing exactly that and it works great. I run Solar
Designer's 'popa3d' on port 110 for those users which do not have
clients supporting TLS, but those who do are encouraged to use the
POP3/TLS running on port 995 which is really just an stunnel to port 110
on the same machine
[On 30 Jul, 2001, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote in Re: pop3 ]
PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
mutt. Anyone
Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:13, Moe Harley wrote:
Thought
I've you are using vim use:
set textwidth=72
in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
I've you are using vim use:
set textwidth=72
in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
