Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-14 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:45:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:34:03AM +0100, Daniel Lange wrote: > > Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: > > > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files > > > has many downsides. >

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-14 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:45:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Nearly all the tasks of actually editing the data require a look at the > complete > data, e.g. to check whether something was tracked before, whether there's an > ITP > for something, whether something was tracked as NFU in

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:34:03AM +0100, Daniel Lange wrote: > Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: > > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files > > has many downsides. > > Could you detail what those many downsides are besides the scripts that > need

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-14 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:09:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > But before going through that trouble, I think we'd need to get approval > > from the security team first, as that's quite a lot of work. I figured > > we