Bug#908678: Update on the security-tracker git discussion

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:25:43PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > p.s.: Question is if we should do a split as well for the other types of > files which are supported (DSA, TDSA, ...) while at it. We can axe out DTSA/* while we're at it. For DSA/list (and DLA/list) we can initially

Bug#908678: Update on the security-tracker git discussion

Hi, On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 01:48:58PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Notes on possible CVE/list splits > > >

DSA candidates

assigned -- ceph/stable -- dosbox/stable -- enigmail/stable -- firefox-esr/stable -- firejail/stable -- flightcrew/stable -- glib2.0/stable -- gnutls28/stable -- golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/stable -- golang-go.crypto/stable -- gvfs/stable -- imagemagick/stable -- irssi/stable --

External check

CVE-2019-10136: RESERVED CVE-2019-10137: RESERVED CVE-2019-12951: TODO: check -- The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere, check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run.