Hi,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
the information gathered in the security-tracker should be displayed in the
package tracker.d.o.
It's already there, see the 20 security issues in
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux
When you click on the question mark you get access to the
Your message dated Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:17:26 +0200
with message-id 201409161117.27841.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line also fixed by r28819
has caused the Debian Bug report #742855,
regarding security-tracker: tabular view should always be by release order
to be marked as done.
This means
control: tags -1 - pending
# rather help is welcome to fix improve the regex as described in the bug log
# (see previous mail to the bug)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - pending
Bug #610220 [security-tracker] url parsing of notes only works with one url per
note
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
610220: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610220
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 16. September 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Let's not continue that bad tradition. If anything it should provide
either YAML or JSON with something structured:
I agree. Any preference?
JSON is more web-friendly, I would pick that.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 761730 -1
Bug #761730 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.d.o: please provide links to
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/$PKG
Bug 761730 cloned as bug 761859
reassign -1 security-tracker
Bug #761859 [tracker.debian.org]
package: security-tracker
Hi,
the ordering of the releases (sid, jessie, wheezy...) and issues (open and
resolved CVEs, DSAs, etc) is not consistent in the tracker web ui (and was
undeterministic in parts).
So what do we have, there are basically two views:
package-centric, like
On Tue, September 16, 2014 09:10, Paul Wise wrote:
Could we get a new URL that also has information about unimportant and
resolved issues and DSAs? I would suggest a format like what lintian
uses:
Not sure what you'd use that additional info for, but I would heartily
disrecommend to display
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
The tracker currently uses Subverion's mixed-revision working copies.
It only updates the data automatically not the code. This could be
preserved by splitting code and data at conversion time. This split
alone might be worth the
9 matches
Mail list logo
