BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making
sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on:

W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
if a man treats life artistically, his brain is his heart.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Kurt Neuenfeldt
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:15:42 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

hi,

 I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making
 sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on:
 
 W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
 following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
 Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Almost the same for etch...

http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/etch/updates/Release.gpg

is empty too.

aptitude update

W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: Unknown error 
executing gpgv


Kurt Neuenfeldt


 
 Cheers,
 
 -- 
  .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 : :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
 `. `'`
   `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
  
 if a man treats life artistically, his brain is his heart.
 -- oscar wilde
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:15:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making
 sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on:
 
 W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
 following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
 Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  This is a known issue, relating to some of the infrastructure
 changes.  Hopefully it will be resolved shortly.

  Currently each of the release files are empty...

Steve
-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1004 +0200]:
   This is a known issue, relating to some of the infrastructure
  changes.  Hopefully it will be resolved shortly.

Thanks Steve. Do you know why this was not publicised beforehand on
debian-security-announce or debian-announce?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
lessing was a heretics' heretic 
-- walter kaufmann


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:33:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1004 +0200]:
This is a known issue, relating to some of the infrastructure
   changes.  Hopefully it will be resolved shortly.
 
 Thanks Steve. Do you know why this was not publicised beforehand on
 debian-security-announce or debian-announce?

  I think nobody thought of it to be honest, and people started
 to notice just around the time we did.

  (The problem here comes from the new dak software being used to
 handle the archive, and this is just a problem that hadn't been
 spotted since we've only just started releasing advisories with it.)

Steve
-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1043 +0200]:
   I think nobody thought of it to be honest, and people started
  to notice just around the time we did.
 
   (The problem here comes from the new dak software being used to
  handle the archive, and this is just a problem that hadn't been
  spotted since we've only just started releasing advisories with it.)

Ok. Thanks for your time and the explanation, Steve.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
it takes more keystrokes to enter a windows license key
 than it takes to do a complete debian desktop install!
-- joey hess


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Schulze
martin f krafft wrote:
 I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making
 sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on:
 
 W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
 following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
 Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Could the reason be that the Release.gpg file has a size of zero?
If so, I've already informed ftpmasters.  If not, what's the other
cause?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1450 +0200]:
  W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
  following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
  Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Could the reason be that the Release.gpg file has a size of zero?
 If so, I've already informed ftpmasters.  If not, what's the other
 cause?

I don't know. My file was *not* zero, it was really a BADSIG.

Now it seems fixed though.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
military justice is to justice what military music is to music.
   -- groucho marx


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)