Re: Re: fast data access mmu miss after harddisk upgrade

2005-04-24 Thread foo_bar_baz_boo-deb
--- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a pretty old heisenbug, which cannot be reproduced reliably (except on SunFire 280R). It has been reported numerous times before, both on this list and in BTS. See bugs #267428, #299043, #301503 and probably others. Can anybody tell me

installation-reports (Vince.McIntyre fwd) [was: Re: Status of Debian on Sun Blade 150]

2005-04-24 Thread Wiktor Wandachowicz
As Vince asked, I just forward this message to the lists. Maybe next time he'll just send it himself :-) Friendly, Wiktor Wandachowicz -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:28:01 +1000 (EST) From: Vincent McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Wiktor Wandachowicz [EMAIL

disk size mismatch issue during install on ultra1

2005-04-24 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Hi, I've got an interesting issue with installing sarge on an ultra1: At the beginning of the partitioning the 9GB HD's are detected correctly as having 9GB. However, when configuring the 1st partition as 4GB, the partition size is reported as 2GB in the partition info screen. When I continue

Re: WG: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-04-24 Thread David S. Miller
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:41:13 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh shit, don't get me started on that IDE controller! I wish people would code as much as they complain. I'll see what I can do about making the cmd646 driver use better PIO and DMA timings like the OpenBSD and NetBSD one