dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc bs=1M count=1
to zorch the disk label.
Sorry about that!
HTH!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One trick to consider. If it's not a boot disk, use an MSDOS / PC
label. The kernel can still read it and it's a lot less flaky than
the
Sun
Hi,
I did sparc packages for my multimedia repository (mplayer, lame,
avidemux, transcode, pymusique, etc...) :
http://hpisi.nerim.net/
http://debian.video.free.fr/
direct link to the packages :
ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/dists/unstable/main/binary-sparc/
Christian
--
To
ok thanks for the answer it help me a lot.
What linux (distribution and
kernel) did you use for running your E4000 ? Is there some application li
ke oracle running on it?
Vincent
De: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
co.uk
A: Vincent 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: migration fr
om sunOS/ultrasparc
ok thanks for the answer it help me a lot.
What linux (distribution and
kernel) did you use for running your E4000 ?
Debian! Hence being on the list :-) I've run 2.2.20, 2.4.18, 2.4.27,
2.6.8 and 2.6.11, mostly the ones that come with either Stable or Testing.
Is there some application li
I tried everything I could and I can't get more then 6.6MB/sec
out of the IDE disks on my Ultra10's.
If anyone can quote better numbers on Solaris, or *BSD, or
whatever, let me hear about it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
What kind of benchmark did you run?
It would be sort of silly if I didn't do a similar test.
I will see if I can get Solaris benchmarks for you as well, but it will
take a while.
--- David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried everything I could and I can't get more then 6.6MB/sec
out
Hi Wiktor,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
- The installer progreses up to the point where it wants to install
a base system, but it is unable to do so. The error diplayed is:
[!!] Install the base system
Cannot install Debian
The installer cannot figure out how to install Debian.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of benchmark did you run?
It would be sort of silly if I didn't do a similar test.
/sbin/hdparm -t /dev/hda
which does an uncached O_DIRECT 20MB read from the IDE
disk, it's the real disk bandwidth not a cached
8 matches
Mail list logo