Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

2012-05-30 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed May 30, 2012 at 22:29:32 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > >> we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

2012-05-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, > On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, >> we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release >> architectures for the Wheezy release. >> >> Comments on / additions

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

2012-05-30 Thread Patrick Baggett
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > > we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > >

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

2012-05-30 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > architectures for the Wheezy release. > > Comments on / additions and co