Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
a écrit :
> Please, do thorough tests in the future before claiming a bug has been fixed.
That's the weird thing, I would have thought >10 hours of parallel
compile was a 'thorough' test...
Apparently not :-(
And I did not claim the bug
On 7/13/20 9:33 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> a écrit :
>> I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6
>> and
>> got this:
>
> Looks like the crash I had, as far as I can remember.
>
> Any idea about the
Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
a écrit :
> I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and
> got this:
Looks like the crash I had, as far as I can remember.
Any idea about the workload at the time?
Is there a lot of parallelism in the
On 7/13/20 9:01 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 7/13/20 8:17 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
>> I really don't understand; I had two crashes before but cannot induce one
>> now...
>
> I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and
> got this:
And now the
On 7/13/20 8:17 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> I really don't understand; I had two crashes before but cannot induce one
> now...
I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and
got this:
[ 7483.258336] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
Le dim. 12 juil. 2020 à 14:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
a écrit :
> Sounds good. I will give it a try.
Thanks to Connor's message about Firefox, I discovered
snapshot.debian.org and could install the 5.6 that I couldn't find
before.
But I couldn't get it to crash with my GCC rebuild script, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
