.
You'd still need to build a cross-assembler, gas does not use BFD.
Incidentally, I have patches for kernel-package to support
cross-compiling at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/36/36863.html.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and recompiled KSH; no compile
errors but the new KSH doesnt exexute at all, it dumps core.
I haven't been able to get pdksh 5.2.13 to work on i386 glibc 2.1
either, however pdksh-unstable 5.2.13.8 from upstream works fine.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
anyone seen this
before? I'm using potato with kernel 2.0.35 and dselect version
1.4.0.31 on a SS 2.
apt 0.3.x and some sparcs (such as my IPC) seem not to get along,
0.1.9 from slink is fine.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
to make a gcc272 package first.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http://web.espy.org/ URL:http://www.debian.org/
already, I wrote an init script that deals
with mounting devpts if the kernel supports it, or removing /dev/ptmx
if it doesn't.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http
to use them on a glibc 2.1 system.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) URL:http://web.espy.org/
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
At 15:52 + 1999-01-26, Jules Bean wrote:
I now find that fakeroot doesn't work for me. I'm building this package
as root, but there's another problem needing investigation.
fakeroot simply doesn't work with glibc 2.1.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) URL:http://web.espy.org
and /lib/libdb1.so.2
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) URL:http://web.espy.org/
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
: application/applefile
pmac-utils.postinst
Description: Binary data
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) URL:http://web.espy.org/
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
At 19:37 -0500 1998-12-14, Steve Dunham wrote:
BTW, Ultrapenguin now has a broken libc - they added the
register_frame_info bug for Red Hat compatibility
It is normal for a glibc compiled with egcs to have the
__*_frame_info symbols, that's all the bug is.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy
/usr/sbin/chroot $R /sbin/ldconfig.new -v
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) URL:http://web.espy.org/
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
it finds lots of which aren't implemented, when in reality it
would be nice if it ignored them.
glibc makes most of its assumptions based on the kernel headers installed
at the time it is built, and only does runtime testing in some cases.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
a workaround for this problem.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://web.espy.org/
Debian GNU/Linux user/developer on i386 and powerpc.
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.debian.org/
I've made a full source package available at:
http://master.debian.org/%7Eespy/glibc/. This has correct binary-pic, and
binary-locales targets, and is fully synced with the glibc 2.0.7t Debian
packaging.
--
Joel Espy Klecker
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http://web.espy.org/
--
To
At 11:12 -0700 1998-07-29, Dan Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 04:27:15PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
Haven't noticed that one (at least not on the alpha under 2.1.106), but
I probably don't want to know...
Hmm. I know it appears on intel...
I saw a report of dpkg failing with
At 11:41 -0700 1998-07-27, Jules Bean wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
BTW, someone needs to build dpkg = 1.4.0.25 for sparc, otherwise, folks
running 2.1 kernels will not have fun.
What breaks?
Everything involving unpacking a .deb.
--
Joel Espy KleckerDebian GNU/Linux
At 21:03 -0700 1998-07-24, Steve Dunham wrote:
Same problem as 2.0.93, bash segfaults after running any command. I
guess it just doesn't like recent kernels. (I'm running a version
2.1.103 kernel, originally from cvs.)
Must be a sparc problem (on certain machines I'm guessing), 2.0.94 works
just
At 02:26 -0700 1998-07-22, Jonas Oberg wrote:
I am a debian developer. It's just that I'm not sure what to do about
these sparc packages, I mean, nothing is changed from the maintaners
package so it's an NMU, whilst at the same time it itsn't :-)
When I compiled the package for sparc, I got these
At 6:10 PM -0700 7/9/98, Steve Dunham wrote:
I'd like to second this request. I can't get Debian to run on my
Sparc 20 with a 2.1.103 CVS kernel. (And the kernel that comes with it
won't even boot.) I suspect the problems are related to libc6
(seemingly the only difference between Debian and
At 7:19 AM -0700 7/7/98, John Goerzen wrote:
Can we put these changes into the appropriate file (libc6-dev)?
The right solution is to upgrade the sources, later snapshots of glibc 2.1
have /usr/include/netatalk/at.h.
The other problem, apparently needs to be solved by using 2.1 kernel
headers,
At 11:19 PM -0700 7/3/98, Steve Dunham wrote:
If I chroot into the Debian partition from my UltraPenguin or the boot
ramdisk, I find that bash will segfault after it runs any external
command (e.g. ls). ash runs fine, but dpkg complains:
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
Hmm... powerpc has
At 20:14 -0300 1998-05-21, Johnie Ingram wrote:
Incidentially is there anyone there who can test the installability of
Debian/SPARC 2.0? I can't really because my only sparcstation is a
server. :-)
I'll try an install of Debian/sparc[1] as soon as I actually get some
memory installed in my
Geert: forwarding this to debian-sparc to see if anyone there is interested
in testing.
--- begin forwarded text
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 12:25:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nathan Hurst
At 19:13 -0600 1998-04-01, John Goerzen wrote:
I would like to help with these. What is the procedure? Ie, how do
the numbers on sparc get changed? Should the maintainer field be
updated? Are changes files to be generated? Does dupload handle
things for recompilation for another platform
At 16:14 +0100 1998-03-06, Juan Cespedes wrote:
I'm not going to upload it yet, I'm going to make sure which
packages fail. If someone wants to have a look at it (warning: they
may make your system unusable), I'll put it in
master.debian.org:/home/cespedes.
Would you mind putting the
25 matches
Mail list logo
