Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz >> <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> [...] >

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Adrian, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for PowerPC32 like Mono > but this isn't a concern for most users, I would say. [...] Thanks very much for stepping up as porter, you

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi all, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >>>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker) >> >> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi Hector, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Hector Oron wrote: [...] > While working out ArchitectureQualification/Stretch wiki page I > believe everything is mostly fine for release, however I got a > personal concern on powerpc architecture. Is it well maintained? Does >

Re: openexr

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote: > [CC me please] > > I am trying to debug openexr FTBFS: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openexr=sparc64=2.2.0-10=1461249335 > > As far as I know there are no porte

openexr

[CC me please] I am trying to debug openexr FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openexr=sparc64=2.2.0-10=1461249335 As far as I know there are no porterbox for sparc64: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi Anyone could try to dump a full backtrace of the crash ? thanks much

ninja-build on sparc

Dear sparc gurus, I am currently starring at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ninja-buildarch=sparcver=1.0.0-2stamp=1355239881 This is extremely hard to deduce the type of error ninja-build could be doing, that does not please a sparc system. I tried getting access to a

gcc ICE

Hi all, I am reporting an ICE for one of my project. Because I am not a DD, I cannot fill a proper bug report upstream (gcc). [ 9%] Building CXX object core/vnl/CMakeFiles/vnl.dir/Templates/vnl_matrix_fixed+vnl_rational.3.3-.o cd

Re: gcc ICE

the bug has been reported as: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50990 Thanks ! On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all,  I am reporting an ICE for one of my project. Because I am not a DD, I cannot fill a proper bug report upstream

Re: gcc ICE

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov  4, 2011 at 10:05:49 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Hi all,   I am reporting an ICE for one of my project. Because I am not a DD, I cannot fill a proper bug report upstream (gcc). This makes no sense

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. Could you

Please remove sticky Dep-Wait: libvtk5 (= 5.2.1-3) on gdcm

Please clear sticky Dep-Wait: libvtk5 (= 5.2.1-3) on gdcm package. Ref: https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gdcm Thank you -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org