Hi Adrian,
> > Interesting behaviour :-). So the problem is somewhere in
> > btrfs_scan_devices() [1], [2].
> > Are you avare about any bug report of this behavior? I haven't found it in
> > btrfs-progs
> > issues list [3] nor in kernel bugzilla BTRFS issues.
> No, I never bothered reporting
Hi Adrian,
> I've seen that on my Amiga 4000 as well.
> The problem is that btrfs tries to determine whether a block device is
> a hard drive or not and if the block device driver misses a certain
> flag (e.g. removable) it will just scan forever.
> In the case of my Amiga, the btrfs module was
Hi Romain, James,
Thank you for great explanation and resources, I'm not experienced in SPARC.
But I tested it on V9, so I guess I need to find V7 or V8 machine.
Although the perfect solution would be a code which runs also in V9 32-bit
chroot, it will
be enough to have SPARC32 implementation
Hi Romain,
> 2017-12-09 0:45 GMT+01:00 Petr Vorel <petr.vo...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Nice, thanks a lot! I might use kernel implementation, but this is handy.
> > (...)
> > I need threads only, no shmem...
>
> The lib was designed to support GCC 4.8 (IIRC) and
Hello,
> >> In any case, the Gentoo people are still on 32-Bit SPARC. You might ask
> >> there
> >> first (see #gentoo-sparc on Freenode). Otherwise, we will have to create a
> >> 32-Bit chroot for you but that would probably take a bit longer.
> > OK, I'll ask them and if not works I'll come
Hi Romain,
> As mentioned by someone else, v7 and v8 do not have them as hardware
> instruction. They were introduced in v9 and its 32 bits sibling, v8+.
As I wrote, yep v8 => I need to emulate implementation.
> You can emulate them in many ways, including with a trivial global
> lock using the
Hi Adrian,
> On 12/09/2017 12:21 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> >> I'm asking because atomic operations were only added with SPARCv8+ and
> >> later.
> > SPARCv8 would be enough as SPARCv7 is dead. So still no hw support.
> From what I have heard, SPARCv7 should ac
Hi Adrian,
> On 12/08/2017 10:32 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > I'm sorry to ask a question here which is not directly related to Debian,
> > it just about
> > SPARC 32-bit.
> > Does anyone have SPARC 32-bit machine and would be willing to allow to give
> > me
Hi Adrian, Mark,
> Yeah I've been trying to dig into the bochs_drm issue recently. I
> recently posted some tips on qemu-devel which might be useful:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-05/msg00045.html.
Thank you both for your tips!
Kind regards,
Petr
Hi there,
sorry for asking for help with very basic question.
I've installed Debian debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso in qemu, which was
successful:
qemu-system-sparc64 -hda debian-unstable-sparc64.qcow2 -cdrom
debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso -boot once=d -serial pty -nographic -m 160
But
10 matches
Mail list logo