Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 19:54 schrieb Gregor Riepl: On the KDE question - does LO really depend on KDE? Isn't there also Gnome support? Yes. *also*. Which means that it builds both and thus build-depends on both (and it ends up in libreoffice-gtk3, libreoffice-qt5, libreoffice-kf5 of what the

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

speak up at upstream or  they will be gone. And without those bridges no architecture support for it. Can you clarify what the consequence of this will be? Will it mean that LibreOffice will become unbuildable for these architectures? Yes. Thanks for informing us, then! I'm 100% in favor

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 19:08 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: You may argue that it's okay because it works on x86_64. However, it only works because Intel didn't make use of the upper 16 bits of a 64-bit pointer in the past although these were always reserved. But that has changed now with the

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hello! On 1/11/23 18:30, Rene Engelhard wrote: But I was more aiming at (and sparc* has the same issue) is libreoffice build-depends on: - libkf5config-dev:m68k libkf5config-dev depends on: - libkf5configqml5:m68k (= 5.101.0-1) libkf5configqml5 depends on: - libqt5qml5:m68k (>= 5.15.2~)

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 12:41 schrieb Gregor Riepl: - sparc and sparc64 (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) [...] Looking at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice#problem-17 , it

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

- sparc and sparc64 (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) Can you clarify this? According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-20 , there _is_ a JDK/JRE built for sparc64 (and other

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi, I am not giung to fight for this - so if you want to keep - alpha - hppa - ia64 - m68k - powerpc and powerpcspe - sparc and sparc64 (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) speak up at upstream