Re: Unofficial sparc64 porterboxes? (For problem unreproducible in Qemu)

2016-05-16 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 05/16/2016 09:58 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > My problem is that under qemu-system-sparc64 [2] I simply cannot > reproduce this problem, the test suite of mksh passes when compiled > against dietlibc. (The other bugs that I could reproduce, see e.g. > the problems in the sid version [3], I was

Re: Unofficial sparc64 porterboxes? (For problem unreproducible in Qemu)

2016-05-16 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Christian! On 05/16/2016 09:58 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Therefore it would be good if I could access to some real hardware > to figure out this problem. Is there such a possibility? Yes, this is absolutely possible. For this, please send me a private email with the following data: -

Unofficial sparc64 porterboxes? (For problem unreproducible in Qemu)

2016-05-16 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, I'd like to ask if I could get access to an unofficial sparc64 box? (There are no official porterboxes, as I've been told by DSA.) I'm currently investigating unit test failures of mksh when compiled with dietlibc on sparc64 (I co-maintain dietlibc, and mksh's test suite is very good at