Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi guys, This looks ok for me now, I updated to 0.8.2 which includes the fix proposal. Please upload if that looks ok for you. Cheers, Le 16/04/2018 à 14:47, Flavien Bridault a écrit : > Ok great, as soon as the merge request is accepted upstream, which > should happen very soon, I'll propose

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Ok great, as soon as the merge request is accepted upstream, which should happen very soon, I'll propose the update. Thanks a lot for testing this. Le 16/04/2018 à 14:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 04/16/2018 02:21 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: >> Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 04/16/2018 02:21 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be applied on the raw upstream, not after debian patches being applied. I was applying it directly into the git repo so that's why I did not have any issue. If you want to keep trying it this way, I attached a

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be applied on the raw upstream, not after debian patches being applied. I was applying it directly into the git repo so that's why I did not have any issue. If you want to keep trying it this way, I attached a rebased version of the patch that should apply well on

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 04/16/2018 11:58 AM, Flavien Bridault wrote: Weird, it applies well for me on the master branch of the debian repository. Try the patch attached to this email or directly this link https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2.diff Tried to apply against the current

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Weird, it applies well for me on the master branch of the debian repository. Try the patch attached to this email or directly this link https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2.diff Le 16/04/2018 à 11:21, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 04/16/2018 11:16 AM,

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 04/16/2018 11:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Meanwhile I commited a fix upstream (https://github.com/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2) so I would just want to try it before proposing the fix in the package. I'll test that for you on s390x. That patch doesn't apply to the Debian version of

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hello! On 04/16/2018 09:15 AM, Flavien Bridault wrote: I sent you a private email twice last week but I did not receive any answer from you so I am afraid they did not reach you. Or maybe you were just away or not available, if that's the case sorry for spaming you... I forgot to follow up on

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Adrian, I sent you a private email twice last week but I did not receive any answer from you so I am afraid they did not reach you. Or maybe you were just away or not available, if that's the case sorry for spaming you... Meanwhile I commited a fix upstream

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Okay thanks a lot for your quick answer ! Maybe I misunderstood the excuses https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=camp, but the build failure on s390x looks very similar at the endianess issue we have on sparc64, so this should also solves that. If not I will contact s390x folks. Le

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 04/06/2018 02:34 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: Okay thanks a lot for your quick answer ! Maybe I misunderstood the excuses https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=camp, but the build failure on s390x looks very similar at the endianess issue we have on sparc64, so this should also solves

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Flavien! On 04/06/2018 02:24 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: I already posted the information but it seems no one got it. My GPG key has been signed by a Debian Developer, would it be possible to gain access to the sparc64 porterbox now ? Yes, we can create an account for you on the sparc64

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Adrian, I already posted the information but it seems no one got it. My GPG key has been signed by a Debian Developer, would it be possible to gain access to the sparc64 porterbox now ? camp has been removed from testing because of this bug and this prevents fw4spl from being updated, I would

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Andreas, I finally managed to find a Debian Developer ! He signed my gpg key yesterday so now I think I can request the permissions to log in the sparc64 portexbox and process that bug. The gpg key is the one used to sign this email. Please tell me if that's ok now. Cheers, Le 09/01/2018

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 01/09/2018 09:15 AM, Flavien Bridault wrote: Otherwise Andreas proposed me some weeks to apply as a Debian Developer, that might be one more good reason to do it ? :) Yes, that would make things considerably easier. As a DD, you can use all the porterboxes without any additional

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Flavien, On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:15:38AM +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote: > No my GPG key has not been signed by anyone afaik. I guess somewhere close to you you can find a Debian developer to sign your key. > Otherwise Andreas proposed me some weeks to apply as a Debian Developer, > that

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

No my GPG key has not been signed by anyone afaik. Otherwise Andreas proposed me some weeks to apply as a Debian Developer, that might be one more good reason to do it ? :) Le 08/01/2018 à 18:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 01/08/2018 06:13 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: > > Ah I see

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On 01/08/2018 06:11 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: > How can I connect to the box ? > > I read on https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi it is public, but the > connection fails if I naively try to login with: > > ~ % ssh sakharov.debian.net It's public for Debian Developers, not public in general.

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Ah I see maybe I should email Ben Collins as stated here https://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/porting.en.html ? Le 08/12/2017 à 10:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > We have a new sparc64 porterbox called sakharov.debian.net. Feel free to

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

How can I connect to the box ? I read on https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi it is public, but the connection fails if I naively try to login with: ~ % ssh sakharov.debian.net Permission denied (publickey). Thanks. Flavien. Le 08/12/2017 à 10:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > We have

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/08/2018 06:13 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: > Ah I see maybe I should email Ben Collins > as stated here > https://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/porting.en.html ? No, that information is

Re: Bug#876147: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:49:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Flavien, > > I have put the porter lists of the affected architectures in CC whether > there is somebody who has a hint for a better solution than removing > these architectures from the supported architectures. This kind of >

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

We have a new sparc64 porterbox called sakharov.debian.net. Feel free to test your code there. Adrian > On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Flavien, > > I have put the porter lists of the affected architectures in CC whether > there is somebody who has a

Re: camp frequently FTBFS on 64bit big endian: camptest-qt (Failed)

Hi Flavien, I have put the porter lists of the affected architectures in CC whether there is somebody who has a hint for a better solution than removing these architectures from the supported architectures. This kind of "random failure"[1] is quite hard to debug for somebody who is not familiar