On 2015-08-07 03:12, Bob Bib wrote:
Following the sparc removal[1], some sparc-specific source packages
(e. g., silo sparc-utils) have also been removed[2].
Obviously, they should be re-uploaded to debian-ports[3],
to be built for sparc64.
I wonder if the debian-ports have any package /
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi,
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2015-07-27):
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (jo...@debian.org):
Hi,
following the last[1] announce, I just removed sparc from
unstable
experimental
jessie-updates
.../...
As a
On 08/08/15 20:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
...
I just moved silo-installer out to the attic this morning.
What do you mean by attic? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Knut Petter Ølberg kpolb...@gmail.com wrote:
After 10 hours of building (my machine is probably not the fastest one),
I can only confirm that the gold linker is still broken in
binutils_2.25-11_sparc64.deb
I'm no developer. But I do have access to a T5120,
Hi Artyom
I think the kernel is going to need this patch:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/08/msg00014.html
This patch does not fix any real bug - it is a cosmetic issue.
I assume you wanted to point out the FPU fix:
sparc64: Fix userspace FPU register corruptions
Quoting Bob Bib (bob...@ukr.net):
On 08/08/15 20:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
...
I just moved silo-installer out to the attic this morning.
What do you mean by attic? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
No problem, I used to wonder what people were meaning by this, in the
past, too..:-)
6 matches
Mail list logo
