Source: freeipa
Version: 4.7.1-3
Severity: normal
User: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hello!
The change to disable freeipa-server on architectures where nodejs isn't
available to make freeipa buildable on these targets didn't work [1].
The affected architectures still show as
Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio, clicca qui:
http://www.mailant.it/nl.aspx?idp=14715=101034=0E2FA94E582CE1334891A9A307CD9E07B21F6098=12519742=0D7A516E843AC638478ED2E04BFFCBC043D02AD6
Hi Adrian
I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures
should have better, more robust support from the Debian project.
For example, arch-specific packages most decidedly have a place in Debian
(although they should not be the norm). There will always be such
[Oy vey, crosspost list from hell -- not sure how to trim...]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures
> should have better, more robust support from the Debian project.
> For example, arch-specific
Hello!
On 12/9/18 3:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> To me it looks sometimes that Debian is used for testing by upstream, and for
> that the mips architectures don't need to be release architectures.
A note on this: If you decide to move MIPS to Debian Ports, you will make the
port unusable to
5 matches
Mail list logo