Re: ash need to be recompiled

On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: Hello, I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid complains about different size for sys_siglist). Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ? I'll do it tomorrow. Anything else you need

Re: The time has come ...

Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 17:31:00 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The time has come ... I have a similar problem. I use X via startx. When I quit X, I get: Thanks for the report Paul. Davem should be adding a change into the CVS

Re: ash need to be recompiled

At 01:17 +0100 1998-11-27, Christian Meder wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: Hello, I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid complains about different size for sys_siglist). Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ?

Status of Sid/Slink/Potato/whatever it is for me

Greetings, I have an SS10 with dual SM61 processors, 128M of RAM, standard ethernet and SCSI controllers, and a cgsix. Here are my observations so far: 1) Running the 2.0.33 on the boot disks (as of a week or two ago) with libc6 (2.0.100-2.1), my syslog fills up quickly with: Unimplemented

Re: Status of Sid/Slink/Potato/whatever it is for me

On Fri, Nov 27, 1998 at 12:39:36PM -0500, J. S. Connell wrote: 1) Running the 2.0.33 on the boot disks (as of a week or two ago) with libc6 (2.0.100-2.1), my syslog fills up quickly with: Unimplemented SPARC system call 102 PSR: 40800085 PC: 500ae110 NPC: 500ae114 Y: 0090 g0:

Re: ash need to be recompiled

Joel Klecker wrote: BTW, I figured out how to get library reduction working with glibc 2.1, it's not a binutils problem at all, it is simply necessary to have the symbol versioning map to give to the linker (which is not part of the libc6-pic package at present, though my current tree does