Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-11-25 Thread Hermann Lauer
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-11-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-11-25 Thread David Miller
From: Hermann Lauer hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:36:33 +0100 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-11-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:09:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Hermann Lauer hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:36:33 +0100 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-11-25 Thread David Miller
From: Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:36:24 +0100 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:09:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote: I'm confused now :-) So does gcc-4.1.3 produce the bad kernels or does gcc-4.3.2? No, Hermann's mail was not relevant, the new NMI code did not exist in