Dirk Dettmann Mailinglisten wrote:
Am Freitag, den 16.12.2011, 17:29 + schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Etch on a U60 freezes predictably if you either (a) put a break on the
serial port (fixed upstream), (b) run xnest (appears fixed in Lenny) or
(c) allow IceApe/IceWeasel to pass a document to
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:18:50PM +0100, Alexander Feld wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask some assistance about my new install sparc64 debian
6.0.3 in a sun blade 150 Hardware.i having this problem in a nautilus
file manager in the below panel, it keeps open and closing
Am Samstag, den 17.12.2011, 11:28 + schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
We definitely do not have a freeze of that nature on a U80 running Lenny.
$ cat /proc/openprom/banner-name
Ultra-80 (4 X UltraSPARC-II 450MHz)
$ uptime
11:16:11 up 52 days, 7:41, 1 user, load average: 2.03, 1.56,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:18:50PM +0100, Alexander Feld wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask some assistance about my new install
sparc64 debian 6.0.3 in a sun blade 150 Hardware.i having this
problem in a
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to
sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My
I believe it was broken in squeeze r0, and fixed in r1. I don't have
access to sparc hw, and
Obviously, assuming that those are the only 4 RC bugs affecting sparc
would be very naive. But if people do not bother reporting them, we'll
never take any action, and release will proceed, again leading to
complaints along the lines of I can't believe this buggy stuff was
deemed a stable
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to
sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My
understanding is that it /had/ been bug reported, and was generally
believed to have been fixed in either the kernel or X, but it quite
simply
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:29:59AM -0600, Patrick Baggett wrote:
Obviously, assuming that those are the only 4 RC bugs affecting sparc
would be very naive. But if people do not bother reporting them, we'll
never take any action, and release will proceed, again leading to
complaints along
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 17:29:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to
sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My
I believe it was broken in
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:53:51PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Obviously, assuming that those are the only 4 RC bugs affecting
sparc would be very naive. But if people do not bother reporting
them, we'll never take any action, and release will proceed, again
leading to complaints along the
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:53:51PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Obviously, assuming that those are the only 4 RC bugs affecting
sparc would be very naive. But if people do not bother reporting
them, we'll never take any action, and release will proceed, again
leading to
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 22:50 +0800, jaomadn wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask some assistance about my new install sparc64 debian
6.0.3 in a sun blade 150 Hardware.i having this problem in a nautilus
file manager in the below panel, it keeps open and closing (multiple
file manager process
12 matches
Mail list logo
