On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Knut Petter Ølberg kpolb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 18:48, Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Knut Petter,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Knut Petter Ølberg kpolb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 00:22, Sam
On 17 August 2015 at 18:48, Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Knut Petter,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Knut Petter Ølberg kpolb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 00:22, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
Hi Artyom
I think the kernel is going to need
So until this is fixed, the ldom would be of no use as a build machine?
Without the kernel fix the system just won't run stable.
The bug in binutils is not that dramatic: the default linker is bfd,
which works just fine.
Only builds of the programs that are explicitly configured to use
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Hi Knut Petter,
Can you please do the following:
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
mkdir binutils-build cd binutils-build
../binutils-gdb/configure make -j8
mkdir gold cd gold
Hi together,
just a short pointer, we will have a bof for 32bit architectures to
discussion issues affecting all (like packages gets larger and larger
and so there are build issues coming up).
The bof is planned for Thursday from 14-15 at the Debconf, room
allocation will follow.
Anyone
Hi Knut Petter,
Sounds fair enough. In any case, I have a running installation which I can
add more cores/memory to whenever it would be usable. So just let me know.
Can you please do the following:
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
mkdir binutils-build cd
6 matches
Mail list logo
