Debian WIki (was: Please update Ports wiki page)

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> 1. Please note that the page is not a wiki, as stated above. That's a good point. Perhaps the wiki page should have a mildly different style to differentiate them. Wiki's are a community effort at documentation, so it makes sense to ensure they are differentiated. Users know they can

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I think the status field saying "released", "discontinued" etc provides the > information with the current layout. > > Thanks for caring about the ports page. I marked the patches for review (in > my TODO) but couldn't find time :/ > Convert it to a wiki page. The work would have been done

Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode

2023-07-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:39 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in > > > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a damnfool thing, > > > then we

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Am 22.07.23 um 14:02 schrieb Andreas Schwab: > > On Jun 18 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > >> For riscv64 I already pointed that out in the thread starting at > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-riscv/2023/06/msg0.html, but for the

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-19 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:50 PM Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Am 20.06.23 um 00:03 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > > > > You can usually uncover them by building the package with CFLAGS=" ... > > -fsanitize=undefined ... " and CXXFLAGS=" ... -fsanitize=undefined

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-19 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:30 PM Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 19.06.23 um 23:19 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> ... > >> I won't be of much help here unfortunately, except > >> maybe testing patches, but then again there's