Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: > AFAIK Address space randomizing is not really helpful on 32 bit > architectures - there is just not that many places to randomize to[1]. Well, sure, but there's still a huge difference in an explot with 100% reliability, or an exploit that will just

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> ppc64: >> >> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We >> have over >> 11.000 packages installed > [...] >> sparc64: >> We are close to

Unofficial sparc64 porterboxes? (For problem unreproducible in Qemu)

Hi, I'd like to ask if I could get access to an unofficial sparc64 box? (There are no official porterboxes, as I've been told by DSA.) I'm currently investigating unit test failures of mksh when compiled with dietlibc on sparc64 (I co-maintain dietlibc, and mksh's test suite is very good at