On 04/25/2018 12:37 AM, James Clarke wrote:
>> -#if defined(__ia64__) || (defined(__sparc64__) && defined(__NetBSD__)) ||
>> defined(__aarch64__)
>> +#if defined(__ia64__) || (defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__) &&
>> (defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__linux__)))
>
> I don't think you
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:52:58PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/17/2018 01:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I can whip up a patch for mozjs52 to add sparc64 support if there is
> > a realistic chance for it to be merged. My m68k [3] and sh4 [4] patches for
> > mozjs52
On 01/17/2018 01:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I can whip up a patch for mozjs52 to add sparc64 support if there is
> a realistic chance for it to be merged. My m68k [3] and sh4 [4] patches for
> mozjs52 are still without any reply, for example.
Attaching said patch. I hope to get
On 01/17/2018 01:33 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
If there are patches for sparc64 in firefox-esr or in upstream Firefox,
they are probably also applicable to mozjs52.
There are, please see [1]. As you can see from [2], my patches were
all merged for Firefox 53 and therefore are not present in
Source: mozjs52
Version: 52.3.1-7
Severity: normal
mozjs52 runs a smoke-test on the js sample interpreter (which is no longer
installed, but is still built) to check whether the built binaries are
in any way functional. On sparc64, the answer is that they are not:
>debian/rules
5 matches
Mail list logo
