Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread Romain Dolbeau
Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > Please, do thorough tests in the future before claiming a bug has been fixed. That's the weird thing, I would have thought >10 hours of parallel compile was a 'thorough' test... Apparently not :-( And I did not claim the bug

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 7/13/20 9:33 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote: > Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > a écrit : >> I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 >> and >> got this: > > Looks like the crash I had, as far as I can remember. > > Any idea about the

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread Romain Dolbeau
Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and > got this: Looks like the crash I had, as far as I can remember. Any idea about the workload at the time? Is there a lot of parallelism in the

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 7/13/20 9:01 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 7/13/20 8:17 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote: >> I really don't understand; I had two crashes before but cannot induce one >> now... > > I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and > got this: And now the

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 7/13/20 8:17 AM, Romain Dolbeau wrote: > I really don't understand; I had two crashes before but cannot induce one > now... I switched one of the buildds which has an UltraSPARC IIIi to kernel 5.7.6 and got this: [ 7483.258336] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-13 Thread Romain Dolbeau
Le dim. 12 juil. 2020 à 14:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > Sounds good. I will give it a try. Thanks to Connor's message about Firefox, I discovered snapshot.debian.org and could install the 5.6 that I couldn't find before. But I couldn't get it to crash with my GCC rebuild script, I

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-12 Thread Gregor Riepl
> (the XVR-600 isn't supported in X). >From what I can gather on the net, the GPU on this card is a 3DLabs Wildcat, with conflicting information about its generation (2 or 4). Sadly, there's no open-source drivers for these cards, and the only proprietary ones available[1] will likely not work

Re: Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-12 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 7/12/20 1:57 PM, Romain Dolbeau wrote: > After failing to deliberately crash my home-cross-compiled vanilla 5.2 > on the Sun Blade 2500 Red, I installed the current kernel in Sid: > > linux-image-5.7.0-1-sparc64-smp 5.7.6-1 > > And managed to do a full rebuild of GCC 10.1 (starting with

Does '5.7.6-1' work on USIIIi for you? (was: Re: sparc64 kernel crashes, & using SAS/SATA drives instead of SCA/FC-AL)

2020-07-12 Thread Romain Dolbeau
Le jeu. 9 juil. 2020 à 13:26, Romain Dolbeau a écrit : > So - has anyone made any progress on this or are we still in need of a > bisect? If the latest, is there any known way to quickly cause a crash > to ensure if a tested kernel is good/bad? I wanted to give a go at bisecting, so first I