Chris Newport wrote:
I will try Sarge in the next few days and report back, but I suspect
that I will need to upgrade to 2.4.29 or later.
AFAIK nobody has done any work on 2.6.x for Sun4d.
Sarge does not boot on Sun4d - this looks like a SILO issue, but I could
be wrong. My SS1000E has never
Fisrt statment : I am sorry for my bad english.
I was installing a sarge on a BS/150 (XVR500 3D Wilcat, 600MHz/512Mo
40GoHD+DVDROM) througt DHCP (boot image 2.6, builded 7mar.2005). I
suffered framebuffer bug that I solved by umounting the 3D accelerator
card (fb on ATI Rage is OK).
Later
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
This also affects the install-manual where sun4cdm and sun4u is mentioned as
supported (What's sun4d and is it really supported?)
Sun4d is the Sparcserver 1000 and 2000 series, they are 32 bit SMP
boxes. Very similar to Sun4m, they work fine in single processor mode
This also affects the install-manual where sun4cdm and sun4u is
mentioned as
supported (What's sun4d and is it really supported?)
Sun4d is the Sparcserver 1000 and 2000 series, they are 32 bit SMP
boxes. Very similar to Sun4m, they work fine in single processor mode
with 2.4.27 and above, but
inkubus wrote:
Sun4d is the Sparcserver 1000 and 2000 series, they are 32 bit SMP
boxes. Very similar to Sun4m, they work fine in single processor mode
with 2.4.27 and above, but SMP is still badly broken. More kernel work
is required.
Have you directly tested = 2.4.27 ? Last time I checked
5 matches
Mail list logo
