Hi,
On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of
Hi,
On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and
Hi,
On Wed May 30, 2012 at 22:29:32 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
Adam,
I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
performance implications, and this is true for both Solaris and Linux and
not recommended by anyone. A 64-bit userland is barely available for Linux
--
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:44 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
performance implications, and this is true for both Solaris and Linux
and not recommended by anyone.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:44 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
performance
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:50:04PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Comments on /
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us
determine sparc's status for
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:50:04PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
