Release architecture requalification

Hi porters To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we want to start the architecture requalification process from scratch again. Therefor we invite people to create and fill in the respective wiki pages. Please only add yourself to the wiki page when you are an active

Port maintenance

Hi Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on sparc issues. Feel free to complete the page for other criteria as well... Cheers Luk PS: Bug #433187 might become a real release blocker... [0] http://wiki.debian.org/sparcLennyReleaseRecertification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Breaking X.Org on sparc (was: Bug#514418: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...)

Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi > > We introduced a workaround by reverting a removal in the kernel to allow > the current X.Org on sparc work. However this patch is not supportable > and breaks all newer machines quite badly. > > This means that we have to back it out again and the only question is if

Re: [RFH] Update of Debian Installer for 2.6.29

Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:51:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Hello porters, >> >> Most arches has 2.6.29 packages ready (AFAIK only hppa lacks them >> right now) and I also did most changes for all arches on SVN to get >> 2.6.29 updating as easy as possible. Now, we ne

Re: Please remove sticky Dep-Wait: libvtk5 (>= 5.2.1-3) on gdcm

Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Please clear sticky Dep-Wait: libvtk5 (>= 5.2.1-3) on gdcm package. > > Ref: > https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gdcm cleared on the 3 arches. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble