Re: Bug#840574: Please backport libgo fixes for sparc64

2016-10-18 Thread James Clarke
Control: tags -1 patch (almost; explained below) Hi Matthias, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 01:47:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 - patch > > James, based on your feedback, I tried to apply these revisions on the branch, > had to update some of these, and got a failed build. I'm

Re: Bug#840574: Please backport libgo fixes for sparc64

2016-10-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 - patch James, based on your feedback, I tried to apply these revisions on the branch, had to update some of these, and got a failed build. I'm not intending to work on this, and would like to ask you to prepare a tested debdiff for a backport or to get the backport upstream if

Re: Bug#840574: Please backport libgo fixes for sparc64

2016-10-16 Thread James Clarke
Control: tags -1 - help + patch Hi Matthias, On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:50:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + help > Control: tags -1 - patch > > James, please could you name the revisions in the GCC subversion repository? > Afaics these are r241084, r241077, r241051. Even

Bug#840574: Please backport libgo fixes for sparc64

2016-10-12 Thread James Clarke
Source: gcc-6 Version: 6.2.0-6 User: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Tags: patch fixed-upstream Hi, Could you please backport the patches listed below so that we can have a working gccgo? They fix the (minor) issue of using the wrong