On 02/19/2018 08:44 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/18/2018 10:40 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
, it's just that
the tool you are using is apparently producing unaligned accesses.
What you emphasized is from the AlphaServer DS25, do you assume that unaligned
accesses lead to bus
On 02/18/2018 10:40 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> , it's just that
>> the tool you are using is apparently producing unaligned accesses.
>
> What you emphasized is from the AlphaServer DS25, do you assume that
> unaligned accesses lead to bus errors on sparc64?
To be honest, you wrote so much
On 02/18/2018 10:48 PM, James Clarke wrote:
Having said that if there are unaligned
accesses reported on alpha then those are likely to also happen on sparc64 and
be the critters we're looking for.
Why do these only trap to software on alpha and not on sparc64? Is that
due to a compiler
On 18 Feb 2018, at 21:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 02/18/2018 10:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> See my emphasis above. It's not that the network stack is broken, it's just
>> that
>> the tool you are using is apparently producing unaligned
On 02/18/2018 10:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
IP-Config: no response after 3 s[ 7.950191] ipconfig(196): unaligned trap at
000120003868: 00011ffcf3af 28 2
[ 8.058589] ipconfig(196): unaligned trap at 000120003868:
00011ffcf3af 28 2
On 02/18/2018 10:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> See my emphasis above. It's not that the network stack is broken, it's just
> that
> the tool you are using is apparently producing unaligned accesses.
>
> Did you try running systemd-networkd?
As a quick shot into the dark, I have
On 02/18/2018 09:55 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> I'm currently working on creating a useful configuration for network boot
> with GRUB2 on sparc64. But I'm experiencing problems during IP
> auto-configuration.
> This is done by using the `ip=[...]` kernel command line option and the
> `ipconfig`
7 matches
Mail list logo