Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
Hi, Thread from Feb: did the ISO image get rebuilt at all? I've got the same problem... Thanks! John
Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
On 02/08/2018 10:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/08/2018 10:22 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Thanks, I tried this one this evening, but although the kernel modules are
there now, the base installation fails due to a dependency problem of the
vim-tiny
editor:
(...)> What can we do about that?
You can fix src:vim on hppa and sparc64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vim&suite=sid
Well, it looks like it got fixed by a rebuild with an updated toolchain
or/and updated packages (compare [1] and [2] after:
```
+--+
| Build environment
|
+--+
```
).
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=vim&arch=sparc64&ver=2%3A8.0.1453-1&stamp=1518005728&raw=0
[2]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=vim&arch=sparc64&ver=2%3A8.0.1453-1&stamp=1518126708&raw=0
I assume a rebuild of the ISO is still required, because the packages
for the base install are included on the ISO, right?
For hppa I don't know if changing `bwipe` to `bwipe!` (on [3]) would
make the failing test "Test_terminal_special_chars" ("Caught exception
in Test_terminal_special_chars(): Vim(bwipeout):E89: No write since last
change for buffer 44 (add ! to override) @ function
RunTheTest[38]..Test_terminal_special_chars, line 13" from [4]) succeed.
At least the test before it ends with `bwipe!`. But on the other hand if
it succeeds as is on most other arches, why should we change it on hppa?
[3]:
https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/218101442e8775bd1f05d1dda18d3946ee032dd1/src/testdir/test_terminal.vim#L620
[4]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=vim&arch=hppa&ver=2%3A8.0.1453-1&stamp=1518031946&raw=0
Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
On 02/08/2018 10:22 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote: > Thanks, I tried this one this evening, but although the kernel modules are > there now, the base installation fails due to a dependency problem of the > vim-tiny > editor: > (...)> What can we do about that? You can fix src:vim on hppa and sparc64: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vim&suite=sid Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
On 02/07/2018 08:38 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 02/07/2018 11:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Yes, I forgot to bump the kernel version inside debian-installer. This is an easy fix. I will do that later today and then rebuild the installer images. New images are up - untested, of course. Thanks, I tried this one this evening, but although the kernel modules are there now, the base installation fails due to a dependency problem of the vim-tiny editor: ``` [...] Feb 8 20:52:56 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing: Feb 8 20:52:56 debootstrap: vim-tiny Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of vim-tiny: Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: vim-tiny depends on vim-common (= 2:8.0.1401-2); h however: Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: Version of vim-common on system is 2:8.0.1453-1. Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: dpkg: error processing package vim-tiny (--configur re): Feb 8 20:52:57 debootstrap: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Feb 8 20:55:03 base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/debootstrap-failed Feb 8 20:55:05 main-menu[208]: WARNING **: Configuring 'bootstrap-base' failed with error code 1 Feb 8 20:55:05 main-menu[208]: WARNING **: Menu item 'bootstrap-base' failed. Feb 8 20:55:09 main-menu[208]: INFO: Modifying debconf priority limit from 'hig gh' to 'medium' Feb 8 20:55:09 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to medium Feb 8 20:55:12 main-menu[208]: INFO: Falling back to the package description fo or brltty-udeb ``` What can we do about that? Cheers, Frank
Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
On 02/07/2018 11:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Yes, I forgot to bump the kernel version inside debian-installer. This is an > easy fix. > > I will do that later today and then rebuild the installer images. New images are up - untested, of course. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: Latest sparc64 installer ISO - no kernel modules were found
Hi! Yes, I forgot to bump the kernel version inside debian-installer. This is an easy fix. I will do that later today and then rebuild the installer images. Adrian > On Feb 7, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote: > > Dear Adrian, > > I just tried the latest sparc64 installer ISO from 2018-02-06 19:28h (from > [1]) on my T5220 and shortly after starting the "normal" installation mode I > get the following message: > > ``` > No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch > between the kernel used by this version of the installer and the > kernel version available in the archive. > [...] > ``` > > ...titled "[!!] Load installer components from CD". > > [1]: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/ > > The used kernel version string is: > > ``` > Linux version 4.14.0-1-sparc64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version > 7.2.0 (Debian 7.2.0-16)) #1 Debian 4.14.2-1 (2017-11-30) > ``` > > I assume it's useless to continue at this point but better wait for a new > installer ISO, right? > > Cheers, > Frank
