Hello Frank,
https://eskimo.com/~jibanes/sparc/idprom2.jpg
I did change the mac address, as you can see in the screenshot linked
above, but it lead to the same outcome. Could you think of anything
else I should try? I could change the byte at fff4dfd9 to 80, but I'm
afraid it would lead to the sa
Hi Jerome,
On 02/22/2018 01:23 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
Frank,
Could you try the following in obp:
cd /pci@1f,0/ebus@c/eeprom@1,0
fff4bfd0 30 dump
and tell me the numbers in fff4bfd8 and fff4bfd9, I would like to know
if it's 01 80 or 01 83
That must be the "(real) machine type" (the second b
Frank,
Could you try the following in obp:
cd /pci@1f,0/ebus@c/eeprom@1,0
fff4bfd0 30 dump
and tell me the numbers in fff4bfd8 and fff4bfd9, I would like to know
if it's 01 80 or 01 83
thank you
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On 02/21/2018 08:39 PM, Jer
Hello Frank,
Thanks for looking into this.
* What installation mode did you use?
The "normal mode", similar to yours.
* I always assumed that MAC addresses from the 08:00:20 block were
only used with "older" Sun machines.
They might, my blade has 8:0:20:c8:f4:a7, but historically had
00:03:ba:dc
Hi Jerome,
On 02/21/2018 08:39 PM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
* Is there a chance that your local DHCP setup is not working properly?
I highly doubt it, as it works well for another operating system on
this blade, although after the dhcp client failure from the installer,
I chose the option to setup t
Hi Jerome,
On 02/21/2018 04:00 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
The same behavior is observed using
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
Timestamped "2018-02-07 20:35" (md5=be24e824141daf81e8ca3640a1f59f9a)
Hope this helps.
I fetched my Blade 100 (should be close e
Hello Adrian,
The same behavior is observed using
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
Timestamped "2018-02-07 20:35" (md5=be24e824141daf81e8ca3640a1f59f9a)
Hope this helps.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
> I see, I can try the official
I see, I can try the official one if you want, and report my findings
within a few hours.
Stay tuned!
Jerome
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 04:49 PM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
>>
>> That's the image I have tried, see the thread title "2018-02-16 23:
On 02/20/2018 04:49 PM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
That's the image I have tried, see the thread title "2018-02-16 23:09".
28311de5f603397922e767f1083b3418 debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
Well, that image is not the official one.
The official ones are here:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/por
On 02/20/2018 05:17 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
> Installer fails to setup networking, I switched to a console, no ip
> address was assigned, I issued
> "ip link set enp0s12f1", the blade locked up for a few seconds then displayed:
Can you try this image?
> https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian
10 matches
Mail list logo
