> I'm also interested to know how good a service you actually get within
> buildings, where most of us are most of the time. I see that wireless
> repeaters are recommended according to a home's floor area. Are they
> repeating 30GHz round the house, or conventional 2/5GHz? If the
> latter,
On Mon 03 May 2021 at 15:47:07 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > It doesn't seem sensible to put a cell-connection into each TV
> > when they're all immobile. OTOH cars and pets go places.
> >
> > And is 20GB of data per day a "reasonable usage" on a mobile data plan?
> > Whereas 1TB per month on
On Mon, 3 May 2021 21:03:51 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Mon 03 May 2021 at 15:47:07 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > > It doesn't seem sensible to put a cell-connection into each TV
> > > when they're all immobile. OTOH cars and pets go places.
> > >
> > > And is 20GB of data per day a
On Mon 03 May 2021 at 15:47:07 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > It doesn't seem sensible to put a cell-connection into each TV
> > when they're all immobile. OTOH cars and pets go places.
> >
> > And is 20GB of data per day a "reasonable usage" on a mobile data plan?
> > Whereas 1TB per month on
> It doesn't seem sensible to put a cell-connection into each TV
> when they're all immobile. OTOH cars and pets go places.
>
> And is 20GB of data per day a "reasonable usage" on a mobile data plan?
> Whereas 1TB per month on a fixed line is quite normal.
These arguments seem stuck in the
>> > There: now your smart-ass TV is a monitor again.
>> At least until they start using a cell-connection for Internet access
>> (which would seem only natural in the world of TVs, which historically
>> got their programs over the air) :-(
> Cars do that already. Why shouldn't TVs? Or pet
6 matches
Mail list logo
