Stefan Monnier [2021-08-02 15:09:38] wrote:
> E.g. the average has moved up to ~80kB/s since my last message).
For your entertainment: I managed to bring the average rate up to about
1MB/s by running `lvs` in a loop at the same time (and that let me see
occasionally a transfer rate around
On Mon 02 Aug 2021 at 15:09:38 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> If it weren't for the first sometimes changing to
> >> 44.xKiB/s it'd be hard to know which is which (IIUC the average is
> >> higher because occasionally the drive gives a more reasonable transfer
> >> rate than that measly
>> If it weren't for the first sometimes changing to
>> 44.xKiB/s it'd be hard to know which is which (IIUC the average is
>> higher because occasionally the drive gives a more reasonable transfer
>> rate than that measly 45kB/s).
>
> So now we're left wondering how you came by this situation.
Anssi Saari [2021-08-02 19:04:59] wrote:
> David Wright writes:
>> On Mon 02 Aug 2021 at 16:14:15 (+0300), Anssi Saari wrote:
>>> Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> >>> > cp /path/to/file.iso /dev/sdX
>>> >>> dd if=whatever.iso of=/dev/sdX
>>> >> It's up to taste.
>>> >
>>> > Not at all. The only
On Mon 02 Aug 2021 at 13:26:19 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Anssi Saari [2021-08-02 19:04:59] wrote:
> > David Wright writes:
> >> On Mon 02 Aug 2021 at 16:14:15 (+0300), Anssi Saari wrote:
> >>> Stefan Monnier writes:
> >>> >>> > cp /path/to/file.iso /dev/sdX
> >>> >>> dd if=whatever.iso
5 matches
Mail list logo