On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 23:37 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/28/2012 1:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Try:
$clive -f best http://vimeo.com/24972836;
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Try:
$clive -f best http://vimeo.com/24972836;
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KufCS2ad0eE
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Celejar:
lee:
Celejar:
If the website gives you a mms:// url, can wget download the
content from that (I don't know, I've never tried it)?
You'd have to try, the manpage of wget doesn't say and I don't have
an URL to try it with.
I'm pretty sure wget doesn't handle such urls.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:24:12 +0200
Siard shiems...@kpnplanet.nl wrote:
Celejar:
lee:
Celejar:
If the website gives you a mms:// url, can wget download the
content from that (I don't know, I've never tried it)?
You'd have to try, the manpage of wget doesn't say and I don't
On 9/28/2012 1:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Try:
$clive -f best http://vimeo.com/24972836;
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KufCS2ad0eE
Regards,
Ralf
On
On 9/25/2012 4:42 PM, lee wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508type=269page=248
Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
this message:
You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
Click here to
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:42:22 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508type=269page=248
Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
this message:
You must install the Windows Media
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
...
like someone else would and it doesn't
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Then install Adobe Flash Player and problem solved.
It doesn't solve the problem.
It will solve the problem of displaying Flash Player videos in the
browser, what makes you think it won't?
That isn't the problem.
I removed the flashplayer library
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:52:10 -0400
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
I've used it many times to watch / download media that I
couldn't access any other way.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:11:22 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508type=269page=248
Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
this message:
You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
Click here to download and install the plugin.
Or
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:20:20 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Sadly, we can't be sure on what the future will provide, so worrying
know is useless and wasteful. The only we can do is having a Plan B,
that's all.
Like I said,
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
Perhaps because they don't want people grabbing the videos and watching
them without browsing to their site, or reposting them elsewhere?
People have
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:16:03 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Like I said, nothing to worry about. Do you have a plan B?
Yes, of course; the same approach that I've used for DMCA-friendly
services: avoiding those that require from me a component which is not
available
On 2012-09-20, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Hanlon's razor applies here as well.
Huh?
I wish Gillette's razor could be applied to some of these threads.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
...
like someone else would and it doesn't work, so I have no reason to
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
I've used it many times to watch / download media that I
couldn't access any other way.
How did you do that?
The above was referencing gecko-mediaplayer and
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:27:35 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
unsupported feature in your system.
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Jo, 20 sep 12, 03:11:59, lee wrote:
Thank you! It doesn't seem to reasonably lead to anywhere. Maintaining
a library of scripts that deal with particular websites which even
continue to change how they present the videos to break such
Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de writes:
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
Adobe says on their website: Flash Player 11.2 is the last supported
Flash Player version for Linux. Adobe will continue to provide security
updates.[1]
What's that supposed to mean? Will we soon
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
...
isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
so difficult for people that they can't
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:20:20 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
unsupported feature in your system.
And that isn't a good situation.
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
...
isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
which are there to let people watch
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net writes:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:30:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net writes:
Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
Testing it now...
Let me guess: It doesn't work.
I couldn't get it to work, but I may have
On Jo, 20 sep 12, 03:11:59, lee wrote:
Thank you! It doesn't seem to reasonably lead to anywhere. Maintaining
a library of scripts that deal with particular websites which even
continue to change how they present the videos to break such scripts
isn't something I would want to do, and I
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:27:35 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
other OSs. They could add features in the new version that make it
impossible to play videos which are compatible with the new version
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca writes:
On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium
are able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
Chrome has
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.dewrote:
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca writes:
On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium
are
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
...
isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
so difficult for people that they can't watch the videos in the first
place.
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 20:15 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Fiddling around by semi-random clicking on stuff and reloading the
page six or eight times sometimes works. In other words, patience is
what's required.
Deleting the cache, closing and opening the browser and last but not
least rebooting
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
Thx, I looked at that and there weren't any. Meanwhile, I tried gnash
and found that it doesn't work at all. Lightspark depends on
pulseaudio, and I don't want to install that. Are there any
alternatives --- preferably using
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:30 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
(...)
OTOH, html5 is now at the corner, my hope is that Flash Player for the
web dies in a very near future...
There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
other OSs. They could
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net writes:
Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
Testing it now...
Let me guess: It doesn't work.
--
Debian testing amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:30 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
(...)
There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
other OSs. They could add features in the new version that make it
impossible to play
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:30:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net writes:
Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
Testing it now...
Let me guess: It doesn't work.
I couldn't get it to work, but I may have gotten a lead. Several
web articles
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:42:57 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
interactive applications. Anyway, what trouble are you having with
Adobe Flash Player?
Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:42:57 +0200, lee wrote:
There might be the problem that, in a while, you can't play videos with
it anymore since Adobe says there aren't going to be any further
releases. I don't know what their plans are, perhaps it just becomes
--- On Sat, 9/15/12, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:08 PM
Adobe says on their website: Flash Player 11.2 is the last
supported
On 9/18/2012 7:53 PM, Go Linux wrote:
--- On Sat, 9/15/12, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:08 PM
Adobe says on their website: Flash
--- On Tue, 9/18/12, Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
From: Mark Allums m...@allums.com
Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 8:15 PM
Some computers don't resume all the hardware properly.
If yours has
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
(...)
What might they be using to play these videos? Where is configured
what they use?
(...)
about:plugins will tell what other flash plugins are installed and
available for your browser.
Thx, I
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
flashgot
I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
apt-get show clive
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
flashgot
I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
apt-get show clive
Sounds good, I'll try it, thank you
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
interactive applications. Anyway, what trouble are you having with Adobe
Flash Player?
Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings like
you do in mplayer. It probably doesn't use
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:09:43PM +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:09:43PM +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net writes:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
There used to be mozilla-mplayer, but it looks like it's not in the
Squeeze repos. There is mozilla-plugin-vlc. Maybe give that a shot.
Hmm, I just tried it and many of the videos on youtube and
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 23:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
what trouble are you having with Adobe Flash Player?
Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings like
you do in mplayer. It probably
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Peter Viskup skupko...@gmail.com writes:
there is something like HTML5 already out.
Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
Hmmm. They are saying I'm
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
How do I get h.264 support in seamonkey?
It will probably happen eventually, but h.264 has patents, so it may not
happen soon. You can always add it yourself through a plugin. But you
may have to *write* the plugin yourself, and it may not be legal in some
On 9/16/2012 2:22 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and seamonkey
supports Video-Tag and WebM (whatever that is) and doesn't support
h.264. They are saying chromium supports all of it.
How do I get h.264 support in
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Chrome is the nonfree version. It is nonfree because it includes
Flash and probably other nonfree things. Chromium is the free version
and does not have Flash nor any other nonfree thing embedded. That is
the specific difference
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
flashgot
I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
$ pacman -Qi firefox
Name : firefox
Version: 15.0.1-1
Architecture : x86_64
$ pacman -Qi flashplugin
Name : flashplugin
Version:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and both browsers still play
videos. In
On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and
On 09/16/2012 12:30 AM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 01:15 +0200, Peter Viskup wrote:
there is something like HTML5 already out.
Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
AFAIK HTML5 draft doesn't replace flash completely. Its
Frank McCormick wrote:
lee wrote:
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and
Peter Viskup skupko...@gmail.com writes:
there is something like HTML5 already out.
Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and seamonkey
Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca writes:
On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
Chrome has built-in Flash - it's called PepperFlash so it does not
63 matches
Mail list logo
