Am 2007-04-05 16:55:57, schrieb zfh:
Its too bad that you never read the documents you
site. Look at the document on treatment of prisoners
of war. The terrorists you seem in sympathy with (see
the first line you wrote in the previous response)
make not atempt to qualify under aritcle 4.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-04-05 16:55:57, schrieb zfh:
Its too bad that you never read the documents you
site. Look at the document on treatment of prisoners
of war. The terrorists you seem in sympathy with (see
the first line you wrote in the previous response)
make not atempt to
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:14:44 +
steef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
So you think, the kidnaping of 17 german and 8 french cizizen and
threeting as terrorists (7 of them are in Guantanamo) without any
judgement since over 3 years is extremely civil ???
The
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 19:43 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
I had hoped that this thread had finally died. No such luck.
It had a mass SMTP drive-by at the hands of Michelle Konzack.
It is truly amazing how well Michelle keeps the old things a goin'. Just
when they run out of water and fire for the
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 03:23:01PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
It had a mass SMTP drive-by at the hands of Michelle Konzack.
ROFLOL!!
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:14:44PM +, steef wrote:
i could not agree more than i do with michelle on this point. the
us-government has become a lawless corporate steered oligarchy. ethical
criteria, the basis of all law, have in this police-state been replaced
by the white house
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:14:44PM +, steef wrote:
i could not agree more than i do with michelle on this point. the
us-government has become a lawless corporate steered oligarchy. ethical
criteria, the basis of all law, have in this police-state been
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:14:44 +
steef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
So you think, the kidnaping of 17 german and 8 french cizizen and
threeting as terrorists (7 of them are in Guantanamo) without any
judgement since over 3 years is
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:26:44 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:55:57 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..are you referring to the passengers onboard flight UA93 on 9/11???
On Let's roll! these civilians _became_
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:33:39 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..I have seen web stuff pointing to Ariel Sharon being unhappy joining
W's war on terror on NATO's side because of the full 4 Geneva
Conventions, instead lobbying these Wannsee language games, this
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:27:32 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:53:31PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I can't resist this one.
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:39:47 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:33:39PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:20:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, the media has suspect motives. The Red Cross generally
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:13:50PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..for further court martial litigation advice, hire me or a lawyer.
The only thing for which I would hire you would be to prosecute me.
Your complete divorcement from reality would certainly guarantee that
the jury would acquit :-)
--- Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:55:57 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..are you referring to the passengers onboard flight
UA93 on 9/11???
On Let's roll! these civilians _became_ lawful
combattants under
Arnticle 4A(6) in the 3'rd Convention:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..I have seen web stuff pointing to Ariel Sharon being unhappy joining
W's war on terror on NATO's side because of the full 4 Geneva
Conventions, instead lobbying these Wannsee language games, this is why
it took them so long (November 2001) to join in.
You really
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I can't resist this one.
Under the Geneva Conventions, enemy combatants that wear no uniforms and
..like the passengers onboard flight UA93 on 9/11?
commit acts of murder and
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:20:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:22:30PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm sorry, but who decided that the memos were of dubious
--- Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I
can't resist this one.
Under the Geneva Conventions, enemy combatants
that wear no uniforms and
..like the passengers onboard
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:53:31PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I can't resist this one.
Under the Geneva Conventions, enemy combatants that wear no uniforms and
..like the
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:33:39PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:20:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, the media has suspect motives. The Red Cross generally has OK
motives, though they are a bit left-leaning in their official views.
..the
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:06:27 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel B. wrote:
That's an unrealistic case that distracts from the rest of the cases.
It's rare the you _really_ know. (Remember that 24 is fiction.)
Oh, I am quite aware it is fiction. The problem isn't that
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:55:57 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I
can't resist this one.
Under the Geneva Conventions, enemy
On 3 Apr, Steve Lamb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find the actions of these terrorists just as abhorrent as you
do.
I doubt that since as far as I have seen until just now you have
done nothing but defend them.
Show me one instance where I defended the actions of
Steve Lamb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Not to mention that such actions are counterproductive. If someone
is tortured into confessing to a crime, it is always suspect.
Yes, but that isn't exactly what is going on, is it? What's going in is
called, if I recall correctly,
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:21:11 -0400, judd wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3 Apr, Steve Lamb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find the actions of these terrorists just as abhorrent as you
do.
I doubt that since as far as I have seen until just now you have
done nothing but
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:10:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and
Am 2007-03-27 12:19:07, schrieb Celejar:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:06:43 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Why thre are 38 Synagoges in Iran?
Why there are wide over 10 Jews in Iran?
There were in 1948. there are only several tens of thousands now,
apparently
On 3 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:10:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* Why does everything need to be some sort of vast conspiracy?
Remember Hanlon's Razor? It could have just as easily been
someone overlooking something, someone going
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban
prisoner's were in fact
denied their GC protections, by being
tortured, mistreated, etc.,
it's pretty obvious that the QCs don't apply
provision was the
operational
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:22:30PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm sorry, but who decided that the memos were of dubious legal merit?
The media? Please forgive me if I consider their motives suspect.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:21:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:10:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* Why does everything need to be some sort of vast conspiracy?
Remember Hanlon's Razor? It could have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Show me one instance where I defended the actions of terrorists.
This thread, pretty much every message you post to it.
or non-existent. Show me one case where this has happened, since
you state that is what's going on.
Well, that's a lovely standard.
Daniel B. wrote:
That's an unrealistic case that distracts from the rest of the cases.
It's rare the you _really_ know. (Remember that 24 is fiction.)
Oh, I am quite aware it is fiction. The problem isn't that I have
forgotten that 24 is fiction the problem is that you, and others, do not
On 2 Apr, Steve Lamb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured, mistreated, etc., it's
pretty obvious that the QCs don't apply provision was the
operational part of this order, and not taken
On 2 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured, mistreated, etc., it's
pretty obvious that the QCs don't apply provision
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:39:02 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:53:08PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
...a real part of Sissy Boy George's Text of order signed by President
Bush on Feb. 7, 2002, outlining treatment of al-Qaida and Taliban
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:10:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find the actions of these terrorists just as abhorrent as you do.
I doubt that since as far as I have seen until just now you have done
nothing but defend them.
Not to mention that such actions are counterproductive. If someone
is tortured into
On 30 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:02:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Interesting. sarcasmIs this where he advocates torture?/sarcasm:
Of course, our values as a nation, values that we share with many
nations in the world, call for us to treat
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:51:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually the executive order was written to obfuscate the
issue. It was pretty widely reported in the press that this order, and
the memos that it references were specifically written to provide
immunity to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/07 08:12, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:51:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually the executive order was written to obfuscate the
issue. It was pretty widely reported in the press that this order,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:38:34AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/07 08:12, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:51:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually the executive order was written to obfuscate the
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:12:44 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:51:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually the executive order was written to obfuscate the
issue. It was pretty widely reported in the press that this order, and
the
On 2 Apr, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:51:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually the executive order was written to obfuscate the
issue. It was pretty widely reported in the press that this order,
and the memos that it references were specifically
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured, mistreated, etc., it's pretty
obvious that the QCs don't apply provision was the operational part
of this order, and not taken out of context quite badly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/07 16:26, Steve Lamb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured, mistreated, etc., it's pretty
obvious that the QCs don't apply provision
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:53:08PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
...a real part of Sissy Boy George's Text of order signed by President
Bush on Feb. 7, 2002, outlining treatment of al-Qaida and Taliban
detainees? And if so, Why Is It Not A War Crime?
You apparently missed the part about the
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban prisoner's were in fact denied
their GC protections, by being tortured, mistreated, etc., it's pretty
obvious that the QCs don't apply provision was the operational part
of this
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03/30/07 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The order in question is this:
http://www.kron.com/global/story.asp?s=1962000ClientType=Printable
Changing subject...
Text of Bush's Order on Treatment of Detainees
[schnip]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/07 17:44, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03/30/07 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The order in question is this:
http://www.kron.com/global/story.asp?s=1962000ClientType=Printable
Changing subject...
On 29 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:36:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's probably referring to the executive order signed on 7 Feb,
2002. In it, W claims the authority to set aside the Geneva
conventions for Taliban and al-Quaeda prisoners, thereby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The order in question is this:
http://www.kron.com/global/story.asp?s=1962000ClientType=Printable
Changing subject...
Text of Bush's Order on Treatment of Detainees
Posted: June 22,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:02:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:36:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's probably referring to the executive order signed on 7 Feb,
2002. In it, W claims the authority to set
On 26 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:10:19AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
...
..anything on international courts or the 4 Geneva Conventions?
Nope. What I find interesting is that you claimed that Bush issued
some executive allowing him to evade war crimes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/07 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:10:19AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
...
..anything on international courts or the 4 Geneva Conventions?
Nope. What I find interesting is
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:36:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:10:19AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
...
..anything on international courts or the 4 Geneva Conventions?
Nope. What I find interesting is that you
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
yeah, but Oregon still doesn't trust me to pump my own gas. Of course,
with some of the crap I see around here, that's probably a good thing.
Is it that they don't trust you to pump the gas safely, or is it
protectionism for gas-station worker as I think it was
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:06:34 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 2007-03-19 02:04:42, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
..as EU members? The EU has its own (token) military force, but I am
not aware of any Swedish troops in Afghanistan.
Me too...
..peace. First we need to hang
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:16:53 + (UTC)
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:06:34 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 2007-03-19 02:04:42, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
[snip]
Or, you will have to _forgive_ Osama for felling the WTC. ;o)
Do you
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:36:26 -0400, Celejar wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:16:53 + (UTC) Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:06:34 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 2007-03-19 02:04:42, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
[snip]
Am 2007-03-11 00:15:53, schrieb Steve Lamb:
* US Friends are few and far between, except when the US gives
them money. Even then, many just take the money and funnel it
into anti-USAian activities.
This one is funny. You do realize that the coalition for Iraq
Am 2007-03-13 12:11:35, schrieb Mike McCarty:
This is ridiculous. Atomic fission was a known phenomenon
before WWII even started.
This is right, but without the german knowlege the would
no have developed the Nagasaki/Hiroshima bomb so fast...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle
Am 2007-03-13 12:10:02, schrieb Mike McCarty:
It is not. We just don't do things through the Gov't,
and that's something to be proud of.
Estimates place the USA charitable giving at approx. $250 Billion USD
total, and between $1.5 and $2.5 Billion for the tsunami
alone.
1.2 to 2 Billion
Am 2007-03-14 20:27:30, schrieb Joe Hart:
my dog, your dog, her dog, his dog, its dog, our dog, their dog. That is
all of the personal pronouns referring to possession of a dog.
In Spanish you have one more.
It is extremely impolite to refer to people as an it, so his or her are
the only
Am 2007-03-14 11:42:47, schrieb Kent West:
his, IIRC.
Michelle/Michèle is a female name in France ;-)
and Michel the male name.
But with me it is MUCH MORE complicate since I am NOT he or she.
Maybe it since I am Hermaphrodite :-)) but living as woman.
As I was in Iran last year it was
Am 2007-03-15 13:59:24, schrieb Ron Johnson:
What mistake do you mean? Michelle *is* a women.
^^^
Multiple personalities?
ROTFL! -- How right you are and don't know! :-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Am 2007-03-15 10:19:16, schrieb Kent West:
D'oh! That means I've created all this mess with my mis-remembrance.
Sorry, Michelle.
Oops! -- Belive it, I am not angry!
For arround 11 years I was thinking I am a transsexual but then one time
I have made an Genetic-Test and... Oops, - I am
Am 2007-03-14 07:34:36, schrieb Steve Lamb:
Even better is that it is France, where she claims to be from, that has
the close to 22% unemployment rate among their youth. At least if NPR can be
believed.
In France it is higher then 8% since the GOV hide it by short term
continue studies
Am 2007-03-19 01:16:16, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
..you missed the boat here. Daddy Boy George failing his command for
the 2'nd time letting Saddam gas Kurds and massacre Shiias, thaught the
There is no proof that Sadam had gased the kurds...
I was there after (german/french UN Mission as I where
Am 2007-03-19 02:04:42, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
..as EU members? The EU has its own (token) military force,
but I am not aware of any Swedish troops in Afghanistan.
Me too...
..peace. First we need to hang all our war criminals, then they have
to hang theirs, all under the strictest
Am 2007-03-18 21:24:23, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
Sorry. Geneva conventions applies to lawful combatants. Now, if any
coalition troops have committed crimes in violation of the Geneva
conventions, then yes they need to prosecuted. Now, the terrorists are
afforded no such protection under
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:05:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:45:58AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:28:24 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You keep claiming this, but have not provided evidence.
..I
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:06:43 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Why thre are 38 Synagoges in Iran?
Why there are wide over 10 Jews in Iran?
There were in 1948. there are only several tens of thousands now,
apparently because of the rise to power of the fundamentalist
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:58:26 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2007-03-14 20:27:30, schrieb Joe Hart:
my dog, your dog, her dog, his dog, its dog, our dog, their dog.
That is all of the personal pronouns referring to possession of a
dog.
In Spanish you have one more.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:06:43PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hey, your name tell me you are not a real US-American...
Are you origin Mexican? - Most (percentage) US-Combatants are Mexican...
They are killing Irakies for a US-Green-Card...
Your ability to excel at displaying ignorance
on Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:39:37PM -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Your ability to excel at displaying ignorance is unmatched.
Regards,
-Roberto
Bravo.
Regards,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 22:39, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 17:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote: [snip]
..you deny the Let's roll!-people
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:28:24 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:10:19AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:00:39 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, let's see. Here is a list of every executive order
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:42:14 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 22:39, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote in Article [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
Sometimes calling a kook a kook and an idiot and idiot is the only
statement you've got. If it's accurate it's not ad hominem.
I dispute the accuracy of your assessment based on your inability to cite a
source
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:45:58AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:28:24 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You keep claiming this, but have not provided evidence.
..I have provided ample pointers for anything but neocon shills and war
criminals, if
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:29:33 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:01:29AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[0] http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1169078731.shtml
..neocon propaganda show, ignores the fact that the Taliban was the
Afghan
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:59:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:56:51PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
It's not a veto issue; the constitution (Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2)
states:
He [the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:59:47 -0400, judd wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23 Mar, Ron Johnson wrote:
...
I'd assume that the US wouldn't be considered a signatory to
an international agreement until it's also ratified. Perhaps I'm
wrong about the terminology.
We (the US) are
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:59:47 -0400, judd wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23 Mar, Ron Johnson wrote:
snip.
..another way is consider the military effect, such as Norwegian gas
turbines emitting CO2, causing some heat up and sea level rise, flooding
low Pacific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/26/07 14:20, steef wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:59:47 -0400, judd wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23 Mar, Ron Johnson wrote:
snip.
..another way is consider the military effect, such as Norwegian gas
William Mok wrote:
I installed X windows system under Debian 3.1.r2, I typed 'startx' but I got
the following error:
xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
No such device
Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
PreInit failed for input device Generic Mouse
Does anyone
..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:31:03 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 08:02:55PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:24:23 -0400, Roberto wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now, if
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:20:41 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/18/07 20:24, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:04:42AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 17:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[snip]
..you deny the Let's roll!-people aboard flight UA93 their
lawful KIA status, when they took up arms against the invading
enemy.
Who says the UA93 passengers were KIA?
For one thing, those passengers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:47:41PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:31:03 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Reference? Where has President Bush stated that war criminals should
not be
..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:21:58 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:08:42PM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:13:41 -0400, Celejar wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is not at all
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:10:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/07 20:21, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [snip]
The Taliban occupied 95% of the territory, called the Islamic
Emirate of Afghanistan. The remaining 5%
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:30:26 -0400, Celejar wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:08:42 + (UTC) Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:13:41 -0400, Celejar wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
[0] http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1169078731.shtml
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:40:59 -0400, Celejar wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:59:35 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Mar, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:58:56 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Acutually, it is the 3rd Geneva convention
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:01:29AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[0] http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1169078731.shtml
..neocon propaganda show, ignores the fact that the Taliban was the
Afghan government on 9/11 2001 when W declared war and invoked NATO
treaty Article 5 and by
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:10:14AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:10:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But... they weren't in uniform. (Did the IEA even *have* an Army?)
..define uniform under the Conventions. ;o)
Prisoners of war, in the sense of
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 17:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote: [snip]
..you deny the Let's roll!-people aboard flight UA93 their lawful KIA
status, when they took up arms against the invading
I installed X windows system under Debian 3.1.r2, I typed 'startx' but I got
the following error:
xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
No such device
Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
PreInit failed for input device Generic Mouse
Does anyone know how this problem
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:32:22PM -0700, William Mok wrote:
I installed X windows system under Debian 3.1.r2, I typed 'startx' but I
got the following error:
xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
No such device
Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
PreInit failed
1 - 100 of 783 matches
Mail list logo
