Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

2010-04-06 Thread briand
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:50:37 +0200 Johan Grönqvist johan.gronqv...@gmail.com wrote: My first guess: Perhaps you did not quote enough text from the man page? [From the text on upgrade] New versions of currently installed packages that cannot be upgraded without

shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

2010-04-05 Thread briand
Hi all, I was having some problems with ooffice so I did apt-get update and then ran apt-get upgrade to see if ooffice was among the packages to be upgraded. It wasn't, but I tried apt-get install ooffice anyway, and presto it started upgrading ooffice. So I looked at the man-page: upgrade

Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

2010-04-05 Thread Johan Grönqvist
bri...@aracnet.com skrev: I was having some problems with ooffice so I did apt-get update and then ran apt-get upgrade to see if ooffice was among the packages to be upgraded. It wasn't, but I tried apt-get install ooffice anyway, and presto it started upgrading ooffice. So I looked at the

Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

2010-04-05 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting Johan Grönqvist on 2010-04-05 23:50:37: I think you may be interested in the dist-upgrade command instead. Now called full-upgrade (though dist-upgrade remains for backcompat). upgrade is now safe-upgrade. -- _ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0 . ( )

Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

2010-04-05 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-04-06 07:12 +0200, Brian Ryans wrote: Quoting Johan Grönqvist on 2010-04-05 23:50:37: I think you may be interested in the dist-upgrade command instead. Now called full-upgrade (though dist-upgrade remains for backcompat). upgrade is now safe-upgrade. This is true for aptitude but