On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> >>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> While
Judah Richardson wrote:
> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
> indicate that a task should be started n seconds after its previous
> invocation completed.
> I couldn't find anything like that in the Debian crontab
> documentation. Is it supported or possible?
On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Judah Richardson wrote:
>
>> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
>> indicate that a task should be started n seconds after its previous
>> invocation completed.
>
>> I couldn't find anything like that in the Debian
On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
>>
>> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
>> Please reboot the system when convenient."
>>
>>
>> I have no plan to
On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
> >>
> >> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
>
G2PC, au 2019-08-17 :
> Trompé dans ma précédente réponse, ok, je tente votre proposition en
> appelant le script depuis crontab.
> De ce fait, cela ne me permet pas d'utiliser les alias dans crontab.
>
> J'aurais souhaité un contournement, pour ne pas avoir à supporter le
> message d'erreur pour
On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
>>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>>>
Hi,
While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
"A reboot is required
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be happy
with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked permanently: and the last thing makes me suspicious. please, if it is possible, an
expert
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> > experience problems I see
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 +
> > loredana wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it
> > > seems that google is going to forbit
On 19/08/2019 08:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
exceptions, but very few.
I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Kind regards,
--
Ben
Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
audio to work when the system resumes.
lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev 03)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 3807
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency
On 18-08-19 21:20, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware',
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:06:57 -0400
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
> audio to work when the system resumes.
>
> lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
>
> 00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev
Here is the output when it is working:
aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC269VC Analog [ALC269VC Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > > functionality of interest. I
On 8/18/19 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Yeah. And Firefox has a checkbox in the prefs to block pop-ups. I rarely
see a pop-up any more.
I have a hard time believing DDG is what's doing your pop-ups. It'd
destroy their reputation.
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> wrote:
[...]
> > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> >
> >
> > Google's evil comes through the backdoor, without making any noise,
> > like
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
> permanently: and the last thing
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
>
> steef wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> > DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> > happy with the popup of
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> experience problems I see often reported. YMMV
It does vary indeed. It seems to me that hardly
Buenas tardes a la lista, tenía windows 7 y actualice a windows 10 de 64
bits, el windows 7 era de 32. Ahora trató de recuperar el grub de debían 9
con ubuntu y con el dvd de debían pero no ha sido posible con todos los
comandos que he consultado, claro que ahora me doy cuenta que el debían que
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
Buenas,
Veo algunas pequeñas (o grandes según se mire) incongruencias:
1. Tienes Windows 7 de 32 bits (lo llamaremos x86) y actualizas a
Windows 10 de 64 (amd64).
2. tienes un debian x86 y actualizas a amd64?
Algo me dice que esto no es posible, pues si actualizas una versión
anterior, lo que
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> > >
> > >
> > > Google's evil
I am allergic to ads.
So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
Have a local searx as search engine.
99.% of the visited sites are without ads, no tracking.
Hope this helps.
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your
Thanks all, I wound up just using @monthly instead.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 4:56 AM Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> > Judah Richardson wrote:
> >
> >> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
> >> indicate that a task should
Comment faire pour savoir si ce comportement avec une connexion bridge est
intentionnel ?
Faut-il le déclarer aux personnes de Debian ou à celles de network-manager ?
(je n'ai aucune expérience pour remonter ce genre de problème).
Quant à analyser et corriger le code, pourquoi pas, mais c'est
On Debian Buster, I have a shared folder that lives on a btrfs raid1 array.
It's located at
/mnt/ToshibaL200BtrfsRAID1/@/Backup/luckyBackup/HPProBook4530s
I would like to ensure that my samba user and mine alone has read/write
access to that folder.
I cloned the permissions from my home folder
31 matches
Mail list logo